Talk:Air Force Viper/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Air Force Viper/Archive 1
More actions
Psutherlin (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:i think now that we have pierre drolet's behind-the-scenes comments on these vipers there's actually justification to keep it out of "virtual aircraft" that wasn't there before. [[User:Psutherlin|Psutherlin]] 21:11, 9 March 2013 (EST) | :i think now that we have pierre drolet's behind-the-scenes comments on these vipers there's actually justification to keep it out of "virtual aircraft" that wasn't there before. [[User:Psutherlin|Psutherlin]] 21:11, 9 March 2013 (EST) | ||
::Doesn't the same hold for the vintage vipers then? I mean, if even Graystone Industries has a painting of these old aircraft hanging in the CEO's boardroam. And the text in the Vintage Viper's article claims the craft is a predecessor of the Air Force Viper. -- [[User:Geo|Geo]] 08:21, 10 March 2013 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:21, 10 March 2013
Caprica[n] Air Force Viper, virtual or real?
I wonder if this model shouldn't be listed under the virtual aircraft section in ship templates, since it was only shown as a flight simulator with Zoe and Philomon. As far as I know there's only VFX modeler Pierre Drolet stating it was effectively used as an atmospheric fighter by Caprica.
- i think now that we have pierre drolet's behind-the-scenes comments on these vipers there's actually justification to keep it out of "virtual aircraft" that wasn't there before. Psutherlin 21:11, 9 March 2013 (EST)
- Doesn't the same hold for the vintage vipers then? I mean, if even Graystone Industries has a painting of these old aircraft hanging in the CEO's boardroam. And the text in the Vintage Viper's article claims the craft is a predecessor of the Air Force Viper. -- Geo 08:21, 10 March 2013 (EDT)