Talk:Daybreak, Part II/Notes/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Daybreak, Part II/Notes/Archive 1
More actions
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Fredmdbud in topic Did the Cavil killed by D'Anna resurrect?
No edit summary |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Did the Cavil killed by D'Anna resurrect? == | == Did the Cavil killed by D'Anna resurrect? == | ||
Is the resurrection process that quick? And where did he resurrect? Was this ever shown anywhere? From what D'Anna said before she snapped his neck, she sounds like the imminent destruction of the hub would preclude that particular Cavil from ever coming back.-- [[User:Fredmdbud|Fredmdbud]] 03:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | Is the resurrection process that quick? And where did he resurrect? Was this ever shown anywhere? From what D'Anna said before she snapped his neck, she sounds like the imminent destruction of the hub would preclude that particular Cavil from ever coming back.-- [[User:Fredmdbud|Fredmdbud]] 03:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:The Cavils have never demonstrated the level of individuality of the Sixes, or even the Eights and Threes. Since they are portrayed as more or less completely interchangeable, as well as in some form of constant communication between copies (as in Occupation/Precipice), I'm not sure there's any point in attempting to follow the fates of individual copies. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:20, 28 March 2009
Did the Cavil killed by D'Anna resurrect?
Is the resurrection process that quick? And where did he resurrect? Was this ever shown anywhere? From what D'Anna said before she snapped his neck, she sounds like the imminent destruction of the hub would preclude that particular Cavil from ever coming back.-- Fredmdbud 03:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- The Cavils have never demonstrated the level of individuality of the Sixes, or even the Eights and Threes. Since they are portrayed as more or less completely interchangeable, as well as in some form of constant communication between copies (as in Occupation/Precipice), I'm not sure there's any point in attempting to follow the fates of individual copies. --Peter Farago 19:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)