Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User talk:Grandmaester314: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of User:Grandmaester314
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Serenity in topic Military ranks
Serenity (talk | contribs)
welcome
 
Serenity (talk | contribs)
Military ranks
 
Line 13: Line 13:
Thank you for joining us! Hope to see you soon!
Thank you for joining us! Hope to see you soon!
--[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 21:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
--[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 21:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
== Military ranks ==
While it's a speculative thread, the additions about the role and command structure of battlestar groups are totally unsupported by anything on screen. It's possible of course, but that doesn't mean that it should be used as proof for something else. It's like making something up to support a desired result. There aren't even two different meanings really. Some groups might consist of several battlestars and others of one. Let alone that ''Galactica'' may be something of a special case due to its age. But we know next to nothing about the specific rank structure involved. So that can't be used as reasoning.
The point about colonels commanding their own vessels is right, but falls apart when considering that one doesn't need to be a captain to command a vessel in real life either. LCDRs or CDRs can and do command smaller ships. They are merely addressed as "captain", but that's both a position and a rank.
In general, there are certainly arguments for placing ranks differently, and given that the roles don't really match with real life ones all the times makes the table a bit of a crutch. But the article pretty much always placed commander as captain.
I re-added the footnotes about Corman's insignia and Adama's lack of an admiral's uniform. That should probably have been noted before already.
Btw, there is nothing that states that ''Galactica'''s class is "Columbia class". That's just a misconception very common in fandom and dates back to TOS. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 23:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:15, 6 August 2008

Welcome to Battlestar Wiki![edit]

Greetings, Grandmaester314, and welcome to Battlestar Wiki! I'm pleased to tell you that you have full editing privileges on every wiki in the Battlestar Wiki network. I hope you enjoy your stay with us and am looking forward to your contributions to the Wiki! Why not begin by telling us a bit about yourself on your own user page?

As you may already know, Battlestar Wiki covers all the Battlestar Galactica series from past to present, in addition to authorized merchandise. Presently, we don't cover fan fiction, but our sister-site, Battlestar Pegasus, does so. We're also not a discussion site, although we do have an ever-growing Battlestar Forum where people can discuss the various shows and non-BSG topics as well!

To get started on the wiki, we suggest that you check out our tutorial, experiment in the sandbox (a test editing area for those learning wiki code), and review some of our basic policies (which have important differences from other SF wikis). For some general questions and answers about the navigation and operation of the Wiki, check out the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ).

Of course, if you have any questions, comments, or concerns, you are more than welcome to bring them up at the Chiefs' noticeboard (which is frequented by the administrators of the Wiki) and at the Galactipedians' Quorum (which is the hub for contributors, who are called "Galactipedians").

Furthermore, if you don't wish to see the ads, then please consider upgrading your account to a paid membership, which costs only $10 USD a year and helps support the wiki financially. Becoming a member also entitles you to our raffle, where you can win gift cards, merchandise, and other prizes! We think this is very cool, and we hope you do as well!

Thank you for joining us! Hope to see you soon! --Serenity 21:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Military ranks[edit]

While it's a speculative thread, the additions about the role and command structure of battlestar groups are totally unsupported by anything on screen. It's possible of course, but that doesn't mean that it should be used as proof for something else. It's like making something up to support a desired result. There aren't even two different meanings really. Some groups might consist of several battlestars and others of one. Let alone that Galactica may be something of a special case due to its age. But we know next to nothing about the specific rank structure involved. So that can't be used as reasoning. The point about colonels commanding their own vessels is right, but falls apart when considering that one doesn't need to be a captain to command a vessel in real life either. LCDRs or CDRs can and do command smaller ships. They are merely addressed as "captain", but that's both a position and a rank.

In general, there are certainly arguments for placing ranks differently, and given that the roles don't really match with real life ones all the times makes the table a bit of a crutch. But the article pretty much always placed commander as captain.

I re-added the footnotes about Corman's insignia and Adama's lack of an admiral's uniform. That should probably have been noted before already.

Btw, there is nothing that states that Galactica's class is "Columbia class". That's just a misconception very common in fandom and dates back to TOS. -- Serenity 23:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply