Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Family Trees: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Family Trees
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'd only use this for families with three generations. Grandparents, parents, children. Or if there are "lateral" relatives like brothers, aunts and such. But not for two parents with a kid or two. That's too obvious. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | I'd only use this for families with three generations. Grandparents, parents, children. Or if there are "lateral" relatives like brothers, aunts and such. But not for two parents with a kid or two. That's too obvious. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
:On articles or even just as 'created' templates in a potential series page? [[User:Shane|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane|talk]]) 16:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | :On articles or even just as 'created' templates in a potential series page? [[User:Shane|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane|talk]]) 16:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
::That's for articles. If you mean a series of pages solely for family trees, then we could be more generous, but again, what's the point of a diagram for something simple? -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
== How to Use == | == How to Use == | ||
Revision as of 17:24, 8 April 2008
When to Use
I'd only use this for families with three generations. Grandparents, parents, children. Or if there are "lateral" relatives like brothers, aunts and such. But not for two parents with a kid or two. That's too obvious. -- Serenity 16:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- On articles or even just as 'created' templates in a potential series page? Shane (talk) 16:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- That's for articles. If you mean a series of pages solely for family trees, then we could be more generous, but again, what's the point of a diagram for something simple? -- Serenity 17:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)