More actions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::::Unfortunately, intuition isn't enough for us here. You might want to give [[BW:CITE]] a read. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:21, 3 October 2006 (CDT) | :::::Unfortunately, intuition isn't enough for us here. You might want to give [[BW:CITE]] a read. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:21, 3 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::::Space Park has been the term used on all official sources, SciFi website, Sky One profiles and i belive the companion books. Giving it a name without an official source would be pure speculation --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 03:11, 3 October 2006 (CDT) | ::::::Space Park has been the term used on all official sources, SciFi website, Sky One profiles and i belive the companion books. Giving it a name without an official source would be pure speculation --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 03:11, 3 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
== How sure are we of some of the info presented here? == | |||
A lot of the stuff about the Space Park being of an older design - utilized before artificial gravity became readily available - comes from the Sci-Fi website and hasn't been proven on screen or in dialog (not to mention that the ship looks ''way'' too advanced to be of an old design). As is the notion that it was a military vessel converted to civilian use. Should we perhaps remove this information? Really, it's just speculation. -- [[User:Helo87|Helo87]] |
Revision as of 21:18, 5 April 2008
Shouldn't we call the Space Park something more Galactica like. This ship could be the Rising Star even with Libran registry. it could've been in orbit around Picon during the attacks? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CoreyDanian (talk • contribs).
- If the "Rising Star" resembles the TOS version, it would look nothing like the Space Park. In any case, we've had no indication that they are the same ship - remember, it's a big fleet. --Peter Farago 19:37, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the Rising Star.--CoreyDanian 3 October 2006
- Do you have a source on that? --Peter Farago 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Nop. Just intuition.--CoreyDanian
- Unfortunately, intuition isn't enough for us here. You might want to give BW:CITE a read. --Peter Farago 01:21, 3 October 2006 (CDT)
- Nop. Just intuition.--CoreyDanian
- Do you have a source on that? --Peter Farago 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the Rising Star.--CoreyDanian 3 October 2006
How sure are we of some of the info presented here?
A lot of the stuff about the Space Park being of an older design - utilized before artificial gravity became readily available - comes from the Sci-Fi website and hasn't been proven on screen or in dialog (not to mention that the ship looks way too advanced to be of an old design). As is the notion that it was a military vessel converted to civilian use. Should we perhaps remove this information? Really, it's just speculation. -- Helo87