Talk:Integral Systems Engineering/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Integral Systems Engineering/Archive 1
(New page: == Integral Systems Engineering a company, or a function? == Is this an assumption, or was Integral Systems Engineering (ISE) referred to as a company, rather than just a functional unit ...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is this an assumption, or was Integral Systems Engineering (ISE) referred to as a company, rather than just a functional unit (i.e. within the Colonial military establishment)?--[[User:Fredmdbud|Fredmdbud]] 01:14, 26 December 2007 (CST) | Is this an assumption, or was Integral Systems Engineering (ISE) referred to as a company, rather than just a functional unit (i.e. within the Colonial military establishment)?--[[User:Fredmdbud|Fredmdbud]] 01:14, 26 December 2007 (CST) | ||
:It's an assumption. Seems more like a department to me, but it could be either. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:15, 26 December 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 12:15, 26 December 2007
Integral Systems Engineering a company, or a function?
Is this an assumption, or was Integral Systems Engineering (ISE) referred to as a company, rather than just a functional unit (i.e. within the Colonial military establishment)?--Fredmdbud 01:14, 26 December 2007 (CST)
- It's an assumption. Seems more like a department to me, but it could be either. --Serenity 06:15, 26 December 2007 (CST)