| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The note confuses me. Wouldn't it be canonical if it did appear that way or no? [[User:DrWho42|DrWho42]] 20:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT) | The note confuses me. Wouldn't it be canonical if it did appear that way or no? [[User:DrWho42|DrWho42]] 20:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
:If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT) | :If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Don't they sometimes take names from the scripts? Bringing canon into this is missing the point somewhat, but the subtitles aren't always right either. It might be better to say something like "might not be official" or "its validity is uncertain". | |||
Revision as of 10:33, 31 August 2007
Canon?
The note confuses me. Wouldn't it be canonical if it did appear that way or no? DrWho42 20:59, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
- If it was in the subtitles then surely it was spoken? Therefore it would be canon? I might have to check this myself at the weekend --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 02:56, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
- Don't they sometimes take names from the scripts? Bringing canon into this is missing the point somewhat, but the subtitles aren't always right either. It might be better to say something like "might not be official" or "its validity is uncertain".