Battlestar Wiki:Quality Articles/Rapture: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:58, 17 May 2007

This discussion is about Rapture's proposed Quality Article status.
This discussion is being used to help the Rapture article achieve quality.

Summary

Insert summary here...

Suggestions

From Battlestar Wiki talk:Quality Articles:

Rapture guide is pretty good. If it was fixed up a little bit more... i think we be golden for an FA status. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 12:38, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

Mhh, yes. That one looks good. Maybe if we find some official statements and a bit more noteworthy dialogue (just a few items. Some pages tend to go overboard with it). --Serenity 12:41, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

I'll try to pull something appropriate out of the podcast for an official statement or two. --Steelviper 13:27, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 == Suggestions ==
-''Start the suggestion here...''
+:''From [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Quality Articles]]'':
+[[Rapture]] guide is pretty good. If it was fixed up a little bit more... i think we be golden for an FA status. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:38, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
+:Mhh, yes. That one looks good. Maybe if we find some official statements and a bit more noteworthy dialogue (just a few items. Some pages tend to go overboard with it). --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 12:41, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
+::I'll try to pull something appropriate out of the podcast for an official statement or two. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:27, 17 May 2007 (CDT)