Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for May 2007: Difference between revisions
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) (FA debate ... my thoughts) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* {{Oppose}} - Not that it isn't a good article, it's just that something strikes me wrong about it. It's almost poetry more than an encyclopedia article. Not that that is bad. Just ... non-FA, IMHO. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 15:14, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | * {{Oppose}} - Not that it isn't a good article, it's just that something strikes me wrong about it. It's almost poetry more than an encyclopedia article. Not that that is bad. Just ... non-FA, IMHO. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 15:14, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
* {{Oppose}} I don't know. It feels more like a better disambiguation than an article in its own right --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:20, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:20, 10 April 2007
Cylon Centurion
Support - I'd prefer this article over Cylons (RDM) ... great related imagery section, detailed analysis, I like it. JubalHarshaw 15:14, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
Cylons (RDM)
Oppose - Not that it isn't a good article, it's just that something strikes me wrong about it. It's almost poetry more than an encyclopedia article. Not that that is bad. Just ... non-FA, IMHO. JubalHarshaw 15:14, 10 April 2007 (CDT)- Oppose I don't know. It feels more like a better disambiguation than an article in its own right --Serenity 15:20, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
