JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) quality article discussion |
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m noting why I feel Cavil is a quality article. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{qa talk|Cavil}} | {{qa talk|Cavil}} | ||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
Article is well-formatted; I really like how each of the appearances are handled in separate sections, with an over-arching "Analysis" section at the end for universal traits and commentary, etc. Excellent images and complete sourcing make this a quality article. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 11:18, 30 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
== Suggestions == | == Suggestions == | ||
''Start the suggestion here...'' | ''Start the suggestion here...'' | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 30 March 2007
| |||||
Summary
Article is well-formatted; I really like how each of the appearances are handled in separate sections, with an over-arching "Analysis" section at the end for universal traits and commentary, etc. Excellent images and complete sourcing make this a quality article. JubalHarshaw 11:18, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
Suggestions
Start the suggestion here...