Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for February 2007: Difference between revisions
More actions
BklynBruzer (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{{support}} Not a fan of silly pages, and the article is very, very good by itself --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:34, 21 January 2007 (CST) | {{support}} Not a fan of silly pages, and the article is very, very good by itself --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:34, 21 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:If you don't mind my asking, why don't you like silly pages? --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 18:58, 21 January 2007 (CST) | :If you don't mind my asking, why don't you like silly pages? --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 18:58, 21 January 2007 (CST) | ||
{{support}} By far one of the top key characters on the show. Well developed article. --[[User:Hobbesy|Hobbesy]] 23:41, 2 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 05:41, 3 February 2007
New Caprican loco weed
Support Drug-related brilliance! --BklynBruzer 08:30, 8 January 2007 (CST)
Support How could I not support an article I initially created? Having said that, any of the candidates are worthy. Even Adamastache (whose several redlinks cry out for additional facial-hair related Silly pages.) JubalHarshaw 15:06, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- Yeah, I'd particularly like to see a Sexy Treason Stubble article. --BklynBruzer 16:58, 8 January 2007 (CST)
Sharon Agathon
Support One of the best articles around. Sloan 11:34, 15 January 2007 (CST)
Support Looks good to me. MatthewFenton 11:38, 15 January 2007 (CST)
Support Agree. Shane (T - C - E) 11:40, 15 January 2007 (CST)
Support Yeah, I like this one. --Talos 11:45, 15 January 2007 (CST)
Support Not a fan of silly pages, and the article is very, very good by itself --Serenity 17:34, 21 January 2007 (CST)
- If you don't mind my asking, why don't you like silly pages? --BklynBruzer 18:58, 21 January 2007 (CST)
Support By far one of the top key characters on the show. Well developed article. --Hobbesy 23:41, 2 February 2007 (CST)