More actions
No edit summary |
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m I agree, Serenity; removing the tag |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Thoughts? I fixed the nested Notes entry, did a few minor fixes ... (it's frustrating sometimes to find articles marked for cleanup and revision with no notes on the talk page) any further ideas? [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 11:17, 11 January 2007 (CST) | Thoughts? I fixed the nested Notes entry, did a few minor fixes ... (it's frustrating sometimes to find articles marked for cleanup and revision with no notes on the talk page) any further ideas? [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 11:17, 11 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on [[References in the Re-imagined Series]]. As for this article: I see no major problems --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST) | :Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on [[References in the Re-imagined Series]]. As for this article: I see no major problems --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST) | ||
Roger that. I'll remove the tag. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 11:24, 11 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 17:24, 11 January 2007
Cleanup
Thoughts? I fixed the nested Notes entry, did a few minor fixes ... (it's frustrating sometimes to find articles marked for cleanup and revision with no notes on the talk page) any further ideas? JubalHarshaw 11:17, 11 January 2007 (CST)
- Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on References in the Re-imagined Series. As for this article: I see no major problems --Serenity 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST)
Roger that. I'll remove the tag. JubalHarshaw 11:24, 11 January 2007 (CST)