Talk:Anne Cofell Saunders/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Anne Cofell Saunders/Archive 1
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m (This article is a good example of a fleshed-out writer article) |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) (→Good example: agreed...) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Good example== | ==Good example== | ||
This article is a good example of a fairly fleshed-out writer article. It even includes a picture. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 12:36, 22 December 2006 (CST) | This article is a good example of a fairly fleshed-out writer article. It even includes a picture. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 12:36, 22 December 2006 (CST) | ||
:And a possible edit by the self-same writer? (The Acofell user with only edits to this page is likely either a fan of her work or her.) I'd of course welcome any assistance the crew/writers can provide regarding themselves, as they don't usually get as much of the limelight but are actually integral to the show and interesting. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:00, 22 December 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 20:00, 22 December 2006
There is a nice picture of Anne in her interview:
http://www.creativescreenwriting.com/csdaily/trenches/11_10_06_SaundersP1.html
--Deus 10:53, 13 November 2006 (CST)
- Wooo, Anne for cameo!! -- Pedda 13:33, 13 November 2006 (CST)
Good example
This article is a good example of a fairly fleshed-out writer article. It even includes a picture. JubalHarshaw 12:36, 22 December 2006 (CST)
- And a possible edit by the self-same writer? (The Acofell user with only edits to this page is likely either a fan of her work or her.) I'd of course welcome any assistance the crew/writers can provide regarding themselves, as they don't usually get as much of the limelight but are actually integral to the show and interesting. --Steelviper 14:00, 22 December 2006 (CST)