Talk:Unnamed characters (RDM)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Unnamed characters (RDM)/Archive 1
More actions
article name |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It might deserve its own article if it contains enough people. But it should be renamed "unnamed Battlestar Galactica characters", since "personell" implies that the "BSG" refers to the ship instead of the show --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:31, 13 December 2006 (CST) | :It might deserve its own article if it contains enough people. But it should be renamed "unnamed Battlestar Galactica characters", since "personell" implies that the "BSG" refers to the ship instead of the show --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:31, 13 December 2006 (CST) | ||
::It is referring to the ship. I modelled it after the Memory Alpha article "Unnamed USS Enterprise personnel" [http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Unnamed_USS_Enterprise_%28NCC-1701%29_personnel], because I thought that if we list all the unnamed characters in one article it might be too long. But you're right, for now maybe it's best to have all unnamed characters in one article. [[User:Ausir|Ausir]] 09:36, 13 December 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 15:36, 13 December 2006
Rename List of pilots to List of crew and merge this into it? --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 09:29, 13 December 2006 (CST)
- It might deserve its own article if it contains enough people. But it should be renamed "unnamed Battlestar Galactica characters", since "personell" implies that the "BSG" refers to the ship instead of the show --Serenity 09:31, 13 December 2006 (CST)
- It is referring to the ship. I modelled it after the Memory Alpha article "Unnamed USS Enterprise personnel" [1], because I thought that if we list all the unnamed characters in one article it might be too long. But you're right, for now maybe it's best to have all unnamed characters in one article. Ausir 09:36, 13 December 2006 (CST)