| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
# Involved members of the community will then discuss the candidate article. Typically, they should be as critical as possible. | # Involved members of the community will then discuss the candidate article. Typically, they should be as critical as possible. | ||
# If the consensus is that the article is of ''potential'' quality, then the discussion will evolve into modifying the article in such a way as to polish the article so as to achieve full "Quality Article" status. | # If the consensus is that the article is of ''potential'' quality, then the discussion will evolve into modifying the article in such a way as to polish the article so as to achieve full "Quality Article" status. | ||
# Once this is done, the article will be | # Once this is done, the article will be changed to {{tl|quality article}}. | ||
# The discusstion will then be archived and the {{tlp|qa diff|''Article''|''DiffID Number''}} tag will be placed so the article can be tracked for when it did get it's QA status. | |||
== Current List of Possiable Quaility Articles == | == Current List of Possiable Quaility Articles == | ||
Revision as of 01:20, 13 June 2006
| |||||
Criteria for a Quality Article
A quality article should have the following attributes:
- The article should be well-researched with proper citations of sources.
- It needs to contain canonical information; non-canonical information should be avoided, unless it has a purpose such as to dispel a common misconception.
- If the article contains POV content, it must be deemed insightful by a majority of the community.
- The article must be properly copy-edited for grammar and style. See Battlestar Wiki:Standards and Conventions.
The following do not qualify as Quality Article candidates:
- Stubs
- Talk pages
- Anything in the Battlestar Wiki, Quotes, Sources, or User namespace
- Past, Current, or Future Featured articles that have been marked.
Identifying a Potential Quality Article
Quality Articles should be identified as such, so that a master list can be created.
Essentially, this would be done in the following way:
- A contributor tags an article page with {{quality candidate}}, then adds a note to the corresponding article's talk page explaining their reasoning.
- Involved members of the community will then discuss the candidate article. Typically, they should be as critical as possible.
- If the consensus is that the article is of potential quality, then the discussion will evolve into modifying the article in such a way as to polish the article so as to achieve full "Quality Article" status.
- Once this is done, the article will be changed to {{quality article}}.
- The discusstion will then be archived and the {{qa diff|Article|DiffID Number}} tag will be placed so the article can be tracked for when it did get it's QA status.