Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Resurrection Ship, Part II/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Resurrection Ship, Part II/Archive 1
Line 7: Line 7:
==Noteworthy Dialogue==
==Noteworthy Dialogue==


What's up with the long dialogue sections? It's supposed to be noteworthy dialogue, not an entire transcript of the episode. I think whoever posts those (And i'm starting to believe its one person doing it) needs to keep it to a minimum, at least keep it to the point where it isn't longer then the article for the episode itself.
What's up with the long dialogue sections? It's supposed to be noteworthy dialogue, not an entire transcript of the episode. I think whoever posts those (And i'm starting to believe its one person doing it) needs to keep it to a minimum, at least keep it to the point where it isn't longer then the article for the episode itself. -[[Bane Grievver]]

Revision as of 02:22, 17 January 2006

Spoiler Pics

I have found a few spoiler pics for the upcomming episode. (You have been warned) Pic 1, Pic 2, Pic 3, Pic 4, Pic 5, Pic 6, Pic 7 --Blacklight

We've seen them, but thanks for the thought. --Peter Farago 03:40, 7 January 2006 (EST)


Noteworthy Dialogue

What's up with the long dialogue sections? It's supposed to be noteworthy dialogue, not an entire transcript of the episode. I think whoever posts those (And i'm starting to believe its one person doing it) needs to keep it to a minimum, at least keep it to the point where it isn't longer then the article for the episode itself. -Bane Grievver