Talk:Glen A. Larson/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Glen A. Larson/Archive 1
More actions
Steelviper (talk | contribs) edited to at derivative2 template search |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:My bad. I was apparently following [[Lorne Greene|bad precedent]]. Does that mean we should blank the Lorne Green article as well? I was sad at how small the Glen Larson article was, and was hoping for a quick fix. Edited to add [http://battlestarwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Derivative2 this] link to everything that uses that template (in case we need to erase those as well).--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:05, 9 January 2006 (EST) | :My bad. I was apparently following [[Lorne Greene|bad precedent]]. Does that mean we should blank the Lorne Green article as well? I was sad at how small the Glen Larson article was, and was hoping for a quick fix. Edited to add [http://battlestarwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Derivative2 this] link to everything that uses that template (in case we need to erase those as well).--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:05, 9 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::Yes, we should. I'm sorry I missed that. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:01, 9 January 2006 (EST) |
Revision as of 04:01, 10 January 2006
For reasons discussed on Talk:Basestar (TOS), we cannot use GFDL content here. I am reverting the article. --Peter Farago 18:33, 9 January 2006 (EST)
- My bad. I was apparently following bad precedent. Does that mean we should blank the Lorne Green article as well? I was sad at how small the Glen Larson article was, and was hoping for a quick fix. Edited to add this link to everything that uses that template (in case we need to erase those as well).--Steelviper 22:05, 9 January 2006 (EST)
- Yes, we should. I'm sorry I missed that. --Peter Farago 23:01, 9 January 2006 (EST)