Talk:Viper 289/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:23, 13 December 2005

I maintain that it is unreasonable to assert that two vipers, explicitly identified by number and having nothing in common (unlike the 791/591 business) are meant to be the same. Are you now going to argue that Raptor 312 never existed, and was retconned into 478? The argument makes no sense, and is not worth noting. --Peter Farago 22:23, 12 December 2005 (EST)

Revision as of 03:23, 13 December 2005 view source April Arcus (talk \| contribs) Chiefs 8,475 edits No edit summary		Revision as of 03:23, 13 December 2005 view source April Arcus (talk \| contribs) Chiefs 8,475 edits mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I maintain that ~~there~~ it is unreasonable to assert that two vipers, explicitly identified by number and having nothing in common (unlike the 791/591 business) are meant to be the same. Are you now going to argue that Raptor 312 never existed, and was retconned into 478? The argument makes no sense, and is not worth noting. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 22:23, 12 December 2005 (EST)		I maintain that it is unreasonable to assert that two vipers, explicitly identified by number and having nothing in common (unlike the 791/591 business) are meant to be the same. Are you now going to argue that Raptor 312 never existed, and was retconned into 478? The argument makes no sense, and is not worth noting. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 22:23, 12 December 2005 (EST)