|
|
| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| }} | | }} |
| {{ArchiveTOC}} | | {{ArchiveTOC}} |
|
| |
| == Moving the TOC ==
| |
|
| |
| This can also be done by adding <nowiki>__TOC__</nowiki> wherever you want the TOC to appear. This not only moves the TOC to that position, but also forces it to appear even if it normally wouldn't (less than four sections in the article). There's also its brother, <nowiki>__NOTOC__</nowiki>, of course. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:59, 4 February 2008 (CST)
| |
| :Ah cool. Let's try that :) Though the article isn't big enough to really need it anyways. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:51, 4 February 2008 (CST)
| |
| ::You'd think I'd learn that trick myself, which was the cause of the rearranging on that awkwardly appearing article, especially that "Overview" item. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 09:58, 4 February 2008 (CST)
| |
| :::Yeah, it doesn't look as good as some other articles for some reason. And leaving the TOC away with using div clears makes the spacing between the headers too large. I think it looks halfway decent now. One sentence, TOC + large picture + rest. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:02, 4 February 2008 (CST)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Questions on "Hero" and "The Passage" == | | == Questions on "Hero" and "The Passage" == |
Revision as of 06:03, 6 March 2008
Questions on "Hero" and "The Passage"
Thanks for editing the questions I added -- your shortened wording is much clearer and better. Ka-Ping Yee 03:18, 13 February 2008 (CST)
- No problem. With the "Hero" question is was not so much length but tense. "The Passage" strayed somewhat into analysis with the elaboration. Usually questions should be one to two short sentences. I could have moved it upwards, but even shortened the point still gets across. -- Serenity 04:48, 13 February 2008 (CST)
