Pictures inside |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It's definitely a "new" vessel. Pictures [[:Image:SixTubedVessel1.jpg|here]] and [[:Image:SixTubedVessel2.jpg|here]]. The first one is motion blurred and the second has a jump effect partially over it. So it's a trade off. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:34, 17 May 2007 (CDT) | It's definitely a "new" vessel. Pictures [[:Image:SixTubedVessel1.jpg|here]] and [[:Image:SixTubedVessel2.jpg|here]]. The first one is motion blurred and the second has a jump effect partially over it. So it's a trade off. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:34, 17 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Thanks for the pics. I was unsure of it's existance at first. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 09:16, 17 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:16, 17 May 2007
This needs a massive cleanup. A picture is needed for a start to bring it at least to the level of details and quality of Five-engined vessel and Wedge-shaped vessel, the two other unnamed but often seen ships. I don't personally recall seeing this ship in the fleet and so I would need to see a picture to convince me its not just an odd angle of a ship already covered in other articles. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 02:53, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
- I'll see if I can find out what ship is meant. --Serenity 07:03, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
It's definitely a "new" vessel. Pictures here and here. The first one is motion blurred and the second has a jump effect partially over it. So it's a trade off. --Serenity 08:34, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
