Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Cyrannus (system)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Cyrannus (system)/Archive 1
OTW (talk | contribs)
Sorry to ask but...
Serenity (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


This is an interesting discussion of planetary dynamics, but it's relation with the series seems tentative at best and [[BW:FANW|fanwanking]] at worst. Could this be moved to a better location (i.e. outside this wiki)? -- [[User:OTW|OTW]] 11:00, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
This is an interesting discussion of planetary dynamics, but it's relation with the series seems tentative at best and [[BW:FANW|fanwanking]] at worst. Could this be moved to a better location (i.e. outside this wiki)? -- [[User:OTW|OTW]] 11:00, 15 April 2007 (CDT)
:Yeah, its relevance and speculative nature is kinda borderline. While on screen, it's only be established that three or so colonies are in the same system - and I'd prefer for them to be spread over several systems - a RDM blog entry states, that internally they went with the "all in the same system" idea. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:09, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:09, 15 April 2007

See relevant discussion on this article here. JubalHarshaw 14:47, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

Sorry to ask but...

...what does this article actually have to do with Battlestar Galactica? As far as I know, in TOS we are only told that the colonies are in the same galaxy, whilst in the Re-Imaged Series we are only told that a few of the colonies were in the same, as yet unnamed, system.

This is an interesting discussion of planetary dynamics, but it's relation with the series seems tentative at best and fanwanking at worst. Could this be moved to a better location (i.e. outside this wiki)? -- OTW 11:00, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah, its relevance and speculative nature is kinda borderline. While on screen, it's only be established that three or so colonies are in the same system - and I'd prefer for them to be spread over several systems - a RDM blog entry states, that internally they went with the "all in the same system" idea. --Serenity 11:09, 15 April 2007 (CDT)