More actions
Steelviper (talk | contribs) note removal explanation |
Move |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
One might suspect just about anything... but I'm not sure you necessarily "would" suspect that the human population "may" exceed the Fleet's. I'm not arguing with the logic, just arguing that it's hedged with enough conditionals that it loses a lot of its oomph, and that there isn't enough canon evidence either way to confidently remove all the conditionals. I yanked this note, and we can let the reader suspect whatever it is the reader would suspect given the presented evidence. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:42, 16 March 2007 (CDT) | One might suspect just about anything... but I'm not sure you necessarily "would" suspect that the human population "may" exceed the Fleet's. I'm not arguing with the logic, just arguing that it's hedged with enough conditionals that it loses a lot of its oomph, and that there isn't enough canon evidence either way to confidently remove all the conditionals. I yanked this note, and we can let the reader suspect whatever it is the reader would suspect given the presented evidence. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:42, 16 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Move == | |||
As per naming conventions, the article's name should be singular. --[[User:Kevin W.|<b><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color: #006400">Kevin W.</span></b>]]<sup>•[[User talk:Kevin W.|<span style="color: #DC143C ">So say we all</span>]]</sup> 18:16, 28 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:16, 28 April 2007
Objection!
Speculation:
- One would suspect that given the number of farms there would be, that the combined human population of these may actually exceed that of the fleet.
One might suspect just about anything... but I'm not sure you necessarily "would" suspect that the human population "may" exceed the Fleet's. I'm not arguing with the logic, just arguing that it's hedged with enough conditionals that it loses a lot of its oomph, and that there isn't enough canon evidence either way to confidently remove all the conditionals. I yanked this note, and we can let the reader suspect whatever it is the reader would suspect given the presented evidence. --Steelviper 07:42, 16 March 2007 (CDT)
Move
As per naming conventions, the article's name should be singular. --Kevin W.•So say we all 18:16, 28 April 2007 (CDT)