Sources talk:RDM Twenty-Something Questions For 3/9/07: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Sources:RDM Twenty-Something Questions For 3/9/07
More actions
bold+indent or pre |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Working on it (obviously). Any suggestions appreciated. I'm thinking about pulling all the Ron's at the end of his responses, since we've established (through the bold) who is talking. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:54, 9 March 2007 (CST) | :Working on it (obviously). Any suggestions appreciated. I'm thinking about pulling all the Ron's at the end of his responses, since we've established (through the bold) who is talking. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:54, 9 March 2007 (CST) | ||
:Should I keep adding the article links (like a podcast) or just yank them? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:12, 9 March 2007 (CST) | :Should I keep adding the article links (like a podcast) or just yank them? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:12, 9 March 2007 (CST) | ||
::Would the <pre> tag work to highlight sections better than bolding? Or perhaps indent the responses? --~~~~ | |||
== Typos == | == Typos == | ||
Should we leave (obvious) typos intact, or correct them? I left them exactly as is, but noticed Serenity touching it up. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:40, 9 March 2007 (CST) | Should we leave (obvious) typos intact, or correct them? I left them exactly as is, but noticed Serenity touching it up. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:40, 9 March 2007 (CST) | ||
:I think we should correct them, but then have a link at the bottom of the page to the original thread with a note saying that all typos and punctuation has been fixed for easy reading? Either that or they should be preserved exactly as written. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 08:53, 9 March 2007 (CST) | :I think we should correct them, but then have a link at the bottom of the page to the original thread with a note saying that all typos and punctuation has been fixed for easy reading? Either that or they should be preserved exactly as written. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 08:53, 9 March 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 14:54, 9 March 2007
Good information but the page is a mess. Could this be tidied up somehow? --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 07:48, 9 March 2007 (CST)
- Working on it (obviously). Any suggestions appreciated. I'm thinking about pulling all the Ron's at the end of his responses, since we've established (through the bold) who is talking. --Steelviper 07:54, 9 March 2007 (CST)
- Should I keep adding the article links (like a podcast) or just yank them? --Steelviper 08:12, 9 March 2007 (CST)
- Would the
tag work to highlight sections better than bolding? Or perhaps indent the responses? --~~~~
- Would the
Typos
Should we leave (obvious) typos intact, or correct them? I left them exactly as is, but noticed Serenity touching it up. --Steelviper 08:40, 9 March 2007 (CST)