Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Promotional Images: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Promotional Images
Steelviper (talk | contribs) (+ comment) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Comments == | == Comments == | ||
Here's my first cut. Feel free to the adjust resolution (I'm not sure if I was too conservative, or too liberal for that matter). Some of our coolest ones that we have are actually 800x500ish, so I don't think 1024 would be THAT bad. Also, as we achieve more of a consensus somebody might create a subpage of this with a draft policy. I wanted to see if there were any major shifts in the consensus regarding the guidelines before I started hammering one out. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:32, 5 March 2007 (CST) | Here's my first cut. Feel free to the adjust resolution (I'm not sure if I was too conservative, or too liberal for that matter). Some of our coolest ones that we have are actually 800x500ish, so I don't think 1024 would be THAT bad. Also, as we achieve more of a consensus somebody might create a subpage of this with a draft policy. I wanted to see if there were any major shifts in the consensus regarding the guidelines before I started hammering one out. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:32, 5 March 2007 (CST) | ||
:1024*768 was just a suggestion off the top of my head. Aren't the pictures widescreen? If yes, then the resolution would be slightly different. Or we could say "1024*768 or a similar widescreen (16:9 aspect ratio) resolution". But doesn't NBC only want 400*400 pics? We'd still be above that. But then, we aren't just a picture storage site, so it might be ok. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:05, 5 March 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 15:05, 5 March 2007
Comments
Here's my first cut. Feel free to the adjust resolution (I'm not sure if I was too conservative, or too liberal for that matter). Some of our coolest ones that we have are actually 800x500ish, so I don't think 1024 would be THAT bad. Also, as we achieve more of a consensus somebody might create a subpage of this with a draft policy. I wanted to see if there were any major shifts in the consensus regarding the guidelines before I started hammering one out. --Steelviper 07:32, 5 March 2007 (CST)
- 1024*768 was just a suggestion off the top of my head. Aren't the pictures widescreen? If yes, then the resolution would be slightly different. Or we could say "1024*768 or a similar widescreen (16:9 aspect ratio) resolution". But doesn't NBC only want 400*400 pics? We'd still be above that. But then, we aren't just a picture storage site, so it might be ok. --Serenity 09:05, 5 March 2007 (CST)