Talk:Squadrons of Galactica/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Squadrons of Galactica/Archive 1
More actions
name change |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't this be called Battlestar Squadrons? --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 07:23, 21 January 2007 (CST) | Shouldn't this be called Battlestar Squadrons? --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 07:23, 21 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:Maybe, maybe not. We don't really know anything about the ''Pegasus'' squadrons (except maybe if there are some insignia in "Pegasus" and LDYB). The only argument for me is that Primus and Vigilantes probably weren't stationed on ''Galactica'' all the time, but since they were that makes them ''Galactica'' squadrons again... | |||
:But if it's renamed, I'm for "Colonial Fleet squadrons". --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 07:36, 21 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 13:36, 21 January 2007
Shouldn't this be called Battlestar Squadrons? --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 07:23, 21 January 2007 (CST)
- Maybe, maybe not. We don't really know anything about the Pegasus squadrons (except maybe if there are some insignia in "Pegasus" and LDYB). The only argument for me is that Primus and Vigilantes probably weren't stationed on Galactica all the time, but since they were that makes them Galactica squadrons again...
- But if it's renamed, I'm for "Colonial Fleet squadrons". --Serenity 07:36, 21 January 2007 (CST)