Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Battlestar Wiki talk:Requests for adminship/Successful requests: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/Successful requests
Steelviper (talk | contribs)
+ stats
 
Steelviper (talk | contribs)
+ implicit votes
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
*Lowest number of supports for successful nom: 2 (Steelviper, that bastard)
*Lowest number of supports for successful nom: 2 (Steelviper, that bastard)
I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
:Interesting. To be fair to you tho Steelviper, you were voted in as administrator at a time when the wiki was fairly new and not as active as it is now. Cool to see that all successfull nom's didnt have a single oppose.--[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 10:13, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
::I suppose I also sort of had the implicit votes of both Spencerian (who nominated me) and Joe (who promoted me). It was just funny to see the one number that bumped down the average (which would otherwise have been a little above six) was mine. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:27, 30 June 2006 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 15:27, 30 June 2006

Stats

Just thought I'd note some stats regarding successful admin nominations:

  • Mean number of supports per successful nom: 5.5
  • Number of opposes per successful num (mean, median... everything): 0
  • Highest number of supports for successful nom: 7 (Mercifull)
  • Lowest number of supports for successful nom: 2 (Steelviper, that bastard)

I suspect that my "record" is likely to stand indefinitely, as the chances of somebody successfully gaining adminship with only one support are poor. --Steelviper 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT)

Interesting. To be fair to you tho Steelviper, you were voted in as administrator at a time when the wiki was fairly new and not as active as it is now. Cool to see that all successfull nom's didnt have a single oppose.--Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 10:13, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
I suppose I also sort of had the implicit votes of both Spencerian (who nominated me) and Joe (who promoted me). It was just funny to see the one number that bumped down the average (which would otherwise have been a little above six) was mine. --Steelviper 10:27, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
Contents