More actions
→Analysis: Duh! ;) |
Comments on recent edit |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT) | :Maybe slap a <nowiki>{{Cleanup}}</nowiki> at the top? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT) | ::Duh! on me. thanks. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
::::I cleaned up the "format" of the Analysis section, but think that it could use a rewrite also. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 14:45, 23 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
I shorted the Analysis paragraphs a lot while still retaining their meaning. It also reads better as the sentences had a tendency to run on too long. A moved about three points to Notes (Cally's role, visibility of the civilian fleet, Boxey's role) where I think they belong better. | |||
What might be moved to Analysis instead is the part about the retcon of the ''Astral Queen''. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:03, 28 December 2006 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:03, 28 December 2006
Analysis
Analysis Section in this episode has been done differently. Just wanted to make a note about it so it can be fixed later. Also, the analysis needs a rewrite. --FrankieG 11:36, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
- Maybe slap a {{Cleanup}} at the top? --Steelviper 11:43, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
- Duh! on me. thanks. --FrankieG 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
- Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --Steelviper 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
- I cleaned up the "format" of the Analysis section, but think that it could use a rewrite also. --FrankieG 14:45, 23 September 2006 (CDT)
- Well we certainly don't utilize those as much around here as, say, Wikipedia. Actually over at "Big W" I think they even have "section level" templates ("This section has been marked for cleanup") though I think that may be overkill, especially with the explanation (provided above). --Steelviper 13:07, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
- Duh! on me. thanks. --FrankieG 12:35, 18 September 2006 (CDT)
I shorted the Analysis paragraphs a lot while still retaining their meaning. It also reads better as the sentences had a tendency to run on too long. A moved about three points to Notes (Cally's role, visibility of the civilian fleet, Boxey's role) where I think they belong better.
What might be moved to Analysis instead is the part about the retcon of the Astral Queen. --Serenity 11:03, 28 December 2006 (CST)