JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) comments needed for quality article discussion |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
This is indeed one of the best character articles around. Lots of stuff, but not enough information to overwhelm a reader like it's the case with the main character. There might still be some style or formatting edits to be made, but I think that's all. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:44, 20 May 2007 (CDT) | This is indeed one of the best character articles around. Lots of stuff, but not enough information to overwhelm a reader like it's the case with the main character. There might still be some style or formatting edits to be made, but I think that's all. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:44, 20 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Additional comments / another set of eyes requested! [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 00:10, 2 June 2007 (CDT) | :Additional comments / another set of eyes requested! [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 00:10, 2 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
:This looks good to me. I think it deserves a nomination for QA. --[[User:Jonathan|Jonathan]] 18:47, 30 July 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:47, 30 July 2010
| |||||
Summary
I figured that since it's been nominated for featured status before, it's probably a shoe-in. Could probably use a read-through, maybe a little concision. JubalHarshaw 01:12, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
Suggestions
This is indeed one of the best character articles around. Lots of stuff, but not enough information to overwhelm a reader like it's the case with the main character. There might still be some style or formatting edits to be made, but I think that's all. --Serenity 08:44, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
- Additional comments / another set of eyes requested! JubalHarshaw 00:10, 2 June 2007 (CDT)
- This looks good to me. I think it deserves a nomination for QA. --Jonathan 18:47, 30 July 2010 (UTC)