Latest comment: 15 years ago by JubalHarshaw
Created page with 'Is there a reason there is a link specifically to the Korean DMZ? I could understand an external link to DMZ generally, but I fail to see why the Korean DMZ would specifically b...' |
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m good point; be bold, especially when you leave your reasoning on the talk page |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there a reason there is a link specifically to the Korean DMZ? I could understand an external link to DMZ generally, but I fail to see why the Korean DMZ would specifically be singled out in this way. If there are no objections, I'd prefer to change the link to "DMZ" generally. | Is there a reason there is a link specifically to the Korean DMZ? I could understand an external link to DMZ generally, but I fail to see why the Korean DMZ would specifically be singled out in this way. If there are no objections, I'd prefer to change the link to "DMZ" generally. [[User:Itsgms|Itsgms]] 19:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Excellent point, link updated. Don't hesitate to [[BW:BOLD|be bold]] in the future, especially when you note it on the talk page. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 20:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:56, 12 March 2009
Is there a reason there is a link specifically to the Korean DMZ? I could understand an external link to DMZ generally, but I fail to see why the Korean DMZ would specifically be singled out in this way. If there are no objections, I'd prefer to change the link to "DMZ" generally. Itsgms 19:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Excellent point, link updated. Don't hesitate to be bold in the future, especially when you note it on the talk page. JubalHarshaw 20:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)