JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m noting why I feel Cavil is a quality article. |
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) comments needed for quality article discussion |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
Article is well-formatted; I really like how each of the appearances are handled in separate sections, with an over-arching "Analysis" section at the end for universal traits and commentary, etc. Excellent images and complete sourcing | Article is well-formatted; I really like how each of the appearances are handled in separate sections, with an over-arching "Analysis" section at the end for universal traits and commentary, etc. Excellent images and complete sourcing round out the article, which I believe to be of quality. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 11:18, 30 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Suggestions == | == Suggestions == | ||
' | Any comments on this article's quality status? [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 00:03, 2 June 2007 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 05:03, 2 June 2007
| |||||
Summary
Article is well-formatted; I really like how each of the appearances are handled in separate sections, with an over-arching "Analysis" section at the end for universal traits and commentary, etc. Excellent images and complete sourcing round out the article, which I believe to be of quality. JubalHarshaw 11:18, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
Suggestions
Any comments on this article's quality status? JubalHarshaw 00:03, 2 June 2007 (CDT)