More actions
Although... |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) →Cleanup: concur |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
On second thought, the first note about his age might be too speculative. The second one is an observation too, but in line with what is routinously done on episode pages. But I don't see much basis for determining his age like that. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:30, 11 January 2007 (CST) | On second thought, the first note about his age might be too speculative. The second one is an observation too, but in line with what is routinously done on episode pages. But I don't see much basis for determining his age like that. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:30, 11 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:Concur. Removing. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:35, 11 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:35, 11 January 2007
Cleanup
Thoughts? I fixed the nested Notes entry, did a few minor fixes ... (it's frustrating sometimes to find articles marked for cleanup and revision with no notes on the talk page) any further ideas? JubalHarshaw 11:17, 11 January 2007 (CST)
- Yeah, it's annoying. I recently encountered that on References in the Re-imagined Series. As for this article: I see no major problems --Serenity 11:20, 11 January 2007 (CST)
Roger that. I'll remove the tag. JubalHarshaw 11:24, 11 January 2007 (CST)
On second thought, the first note about his age might be too speculative. The second one is an observation too, but in line with what is routinously done on episode pages. But I don't see much basis for determining his age like that. --Serenity 11:30, 11 January 2007 (CST)
- Concur. Removing. --Steelviper 11:35, 11 January 2007 (CST)