Editing User talk:Steelviper/CommunityPortal
Discussion page of User:Steelviper/CommunityPortal
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm hesitant to edit this unilaterally, but if we want to re-open the [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Citation Jihad|discussion]] over the name of the Citation Jihad, the talk page is the place to do it. --[[User: | I'm hesitant to edit this unilaterally, but if we want to re-open the [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Citation Jihad|discussion]] over the name of the Citation Jihad, the talk page is the place to do it. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 11:45, 31 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:Wouldn't have been a problem. I take no issue with the current name at all. I was just being silly, and didn't realize how quickly people would be checking this out. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:56, 31 January 2006 (EST) | :Wouldn't have been a problem. I take no issue with the current name at all. I was just being silly, and didn't realize how quickly people would be checking this out. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:56, 31 January 2006 (EST) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Quality Article == | == Quality Article == | ||
Bonus points are available for finding a place on here for a featured/quality article. Although we currently only have one (and its the [[Sandbox]] (I was testing the template), it sounds like we might have more in the future. Quality article candidates (as soon as a template for that exists) might be featured as collaborations so they can get the polish needed to become quality articles. But I'm wondering where we might fit a featured article that is finished. (Unless that belongs more on the main page). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 16:40, 1 February 2006 (EST) | Bonus points are available for finding a place on here for a featured/quality article. Although we currently only have one (and its the [[Sandbox]] (I was testing the template), it sounds like we might have more in the future. Quality article candidates (as soon as a template for that exists) might be featured as collaborations so they can get the polish needed to become quality articles. But I'm wondering where we might fit a featured article that is finished. (Unless that belongs more on the main page). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 16:40, 1 February 2006 (EST) | ||