Editing User talk:Shane/Archive3
Discussion page of User:Shane/Archive3
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Cape Cod, MA == | == Cape Cod, MA == | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
==Template:Location Data== | ==Template:Location Data== | ||
I don't think [[Template:Location Data|this]] is a bad idea, Shane, but isn't there any way you could have proposed it and gotten feedback before you ran off and implemented it on a dozen pages? --[[User: | I don't think [[Template:Location Data|this]] is a bad idea, Shane, but isn't there any way you could have proposed it and gotten feedback before you ran off and implemented it on a dozen pages? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 13:08, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Technically, it's only on 5 pages. It just using the same Category as most. Why would I need to take an extra step to get "Good Faith"? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 13:14, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | :Technically, it's only on 5 pages. It just using the same Category as most. Why would I need to take an extra step to get "Good Faith"? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 13:14, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
::It's a fairly large project, and just because I don't mind it (although I'm also not convinced it's necessary) doesn't mean that nobody else might have something to say. It's always a good idea to bring up major changes on the Quorum to get differing viewpoints before you implement them. --[[User: | ::It's a fairly large project, and just because I don't mind it (although I'm also not convinced it's necessary) doesn't mean that nobody else might have something to say. It's always a good idea to bring up major changes on the Quorum to get differing viewpoints before you implement them. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 13:21, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
::: | :::Peter, I suggest you read up on [[BW:BOLD]]. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 14:03, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::[[Be bold in updating pages#...but don't be reckless!|...but don't be reckless.]] --[[User: | ::::[[Be bold in updating pages#...but don't be reckless!|...but don't be reckless.]] --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:06, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::::[[Be bold in updating pages#...but don't be reckless!|...but don't be reckless.]] regrades to "''That's a good thing. But please note: be bold in updating pages does not mean that you should make deletions to long articles on complex, controversial subjects with long histories, such as re-imagining or God.''". And I am "''If you are an experienced Wikipedian, you will probably have a good sense of which edits will be accepted, and which should be discussed first.''" so I know that this was accepted as you already indicated. Refer to [[Be bold in updating pages#Don't let that scare you off!|Don't let that scare you off!]] --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 14:09, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | :::::[[Be bold in updating pages#...but don't be reckless!|...but don't be reckless.]] regrades to "''That's a good thing. But please note: be bold in updating pages does not mean that you should make deletions to long articles on complex, controversial subjects with long histories, such as re-imagining or God.''". And I am "''If you are an experienced Wikipedian, you will probably have a good sense of which edits will be accepted, and which should be discussed first.''" so I know that this was accepted as you already indicated. Refer to [[Be bold in updating pages#Don't let that scare you off!|Don't let that scare you off!]] --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 14:09, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::::All I'm asking you to do is display a little courtesy to your fellow editors. I don't think it will kill you. --[[User: | ::::::All I'm asking you to do is display a little courtesy to your fellow editors. I don't think it will kill you. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:47, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::::::That is not what ''you'' orginally ask. You asked for me share your idea. If there was a disagrement on the use of the template, you should have posted in on the template talk page. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 16:03, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | :::::::That is not what ''you'' orginally ask. You asked for me share your idea. If there was a disagrement on the use of the template, you should have posted in on the template talk page. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 16:03, 10 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
Shane, I've read the above exchange and noted | Shane, I've read the above exchange and noted Peter's recent reverts, of which I concur with. The absence of disagreement or comment does not necessarily indicate acceptance of a change. It's important not just to do, or to ask and wait for an hour, but to give time (1 day or more) for any comments or responses, and to consider what such changes do. We've all seen the magic you can throw here and I, for one, am impressed by it. But changes must occur for a reason. The location template you made looks nice, but does add a level of complexity to a page that appears unnecessary. In the case of the "Tomb of the Ninth Lord," it seemed particularly cumbersome since it is very likely that no additional data will ever be added to that page. Also, just because we have an ability to do something (particularly with the newer MediaWiki software) doesn't make it a very good idea to apply all its features. Please use the Quorum to voice things first, AND also note the suggestion on the article's talk page to help with attention as well. As with the Main Page, you can also always make a mockup as a demonstration to point us to--just don't do it to live pages until we've all had a say (which can take a while). Also remember: You're not just "talking" to Peter here. Try directing your thoughts to the collective editors and it won't feel so personal. I'm sure Peter (or anyone) is NOT centering you out except to ask you to help work with you and not against your contribution. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 19:56, 11 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Besides me and | :Besides me and Peter's inability to work together sometimes, the location template is not just for TOS use, but RDM use as well. Though there are little things in each of the TOS, those are to be expanded because of the "TOS Development" project. Main page was never a problem. I do my work at [[BW:MAIN]] already. Another problem is that I do so many changes and so many addons, that my contribs list is to long for any one person to work on. I been meaning to update my user page, so that I list my projects. I will do something on there that reflects what I am working on. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 21:13, 11 June 2006 (CDT) | ||