Editing User talk:RMelon
Discussion page of User:RMelon
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Welcome. I rolled back the minor edit in [[Eye of Jupiter]]. We don't know of any chronological association between the various Cylon models; the numbers themselves don't tell the whole story. To viewers, the final five are the last five revealed, but to the Cylons, they are simply missing. It could be the first five made, or the last five made, or something in between. For now, "lost" is preferable to "last" for the purposes of that article. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:57, 1 February 2007 (CST) | Welcome. I rolled back the minor edit in [[Eye of Jupiter]]. We don't know of any chronological association between the various Cylon models; the numbers themselves don't tell the whole story. To viewers, the final five are the last five revealed, but to the Cylons, they are simply missing. It could be the first five made, or the last five made, or something in between. For now, "lost" is preferable to "last" for the purposes of that article. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:57, 1 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:Understandable, but they're not really "lost," we just don't know who they are. If anyone sees this, what do ''you'' think about using a different word, like "unknown?" [[User:RMelon|RMelon]] 10:08, 1 February 2007 (CST) | :Understandable, but they're not really "lost," we just don't know who they are. If anyone sees this, what do ''you'' think about using a different word, like "unknown?" [[User:RMelon|RMelon]] 10:08, 1 February 2007 (CST) | ||