| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Your fight with [[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]]== | | ==Your fight with [[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]]== |
|
| |
|
| Gentlemen: rather than reverting each other's edits on [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylons]], please attempt a civilized discussion on the article's [[Talk:Cylons|talk page]]. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 15:04, 31 August 2005 (EDT) | | Gentlemen: rather than reverting each other's edits on [[Cylons (RDM)|Cylons]], please attempt a civilized discussion on the article's [[Talk:Cylons|talk page]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:04, 31 August 2005 (EDT) |
|
| |
|
| == Character Data Template == | | == Character Data Template == |
| Line 59: |
Line 59: |
| ::If there's self-argumentation, it may be RDM's fault anyway: | | ::If there's self-argumentation, it may be RDM's fault anyway: |
| ::"And the idea was, and it still is, that there are connections between their world and our world." (from the podcast) | | ::"And the idea was, and it still is, that there are connections between their world and our world." (from the podcast) |
| ::So he is saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT) | | ::So he saying, "It's not a transmission from Earth," but yet that there is is some sort of (as yet unexplained) connection. I'm not sure if by "our world" he's saying "Earth" or saying present day earth/reality. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:59, 19 April 2007 (CDT) |
| :::I suspect Spencerian doesn't understand the distinction between theme and plot. Thematically, "All Along The Watchtower" DOES suggest a connection to Earth—there's no other reason for including it—even though, plotwise, the music may not originate from Earth. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
| |
| ::::The problem, as I read, involved primarily that you had generally repeated the same information in the article without a source, and it read poorly as edited with the original cite and source. Now that you have another, stronger citation, I've revised the references to unify both points (the original reference on Moore's decision was from McCreary's blog, but yours has a stronger citation with a direct quote). Concision is always preferable, IMO -- [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:04, 19 April 2007 (CDT) <sup>([[User_Talk:Spencerian|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Spencerian|Contrib Skillz]] - [[Special:Editcount/Spencerian|Edit Skillz]])</sup>
| |
| :::::The problem is that you don't understand the distinction between theme and plot, and saw a contradiction where there was none. I shouldn't have even needed a reference to make such an obvious point (well, obvious to those of us who understand how fiction works), but I happened to find one today and felt it would somewhat force the point. [[User:Philwelch|Philwelch]] 16:06, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
| |
| ::::::Citing is always good, and never unnecessary. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 16:31, 19 April 2007 (CDT)
| |