| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on your user talk page, the [[Battlestar Wiki:Wikipedian Quorum|Wikipedian Quorum]] or [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|Administrators' noticeboard]]. Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~<!---->~~<!---->~)! --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 00:54, 3 March 2006 (CST) | | Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on your user talk page, the [[Battlestar Wiki:Wikipedian Quorum|Wikipedian Quorum]] or [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|Administrators' noticeboard]]. Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~<!---->~~<!---->~)! --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 00:54, 3 March 2006 (CST) |
|
| |
| ==Recent Revert Involving Earth==
| |
|
| |
| I rewrote the article on earth, as you stated that the planet in daybreak part II was not earth. But, you can see from orbit that it is earth because you can see africa clearly from orbit and on a map that adama points to has a VERY detailed map of austrialia, africa, asia, and pretty much the entire earth. They say while watching a native tribe that it is a miracle that humanity evolved 1,000,000 light years away (from caprica), not that it is 100000 light years from earth. it is not new earth, and they do not day that phrase at all in the episode. [[User:Acaeton|Acaeton]] 02:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Thanks! == | | == Thanks! == |
| Line 19: |
Line 15: |
|
| |
|
| ==Talk:Precipice== | | ==Talk:Precipice== |
| Merv posted a lengthy comment, which I replied to. He then thought better of it and deleted it, making my reply bizarre and nonsensical, so I restored it with <nowiki><del></nowiki> tags to indicate that he'd withdrawn the opinion. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 13:28, 22 April 2006 (CDT) | | Merv posted a lengthy comment, which I replied to. He then thought better of it and deleted it, making my reply bizarre and nonsensical, so I restored it with <nowiki><del></nowiki> tags to indicate that he'd withdrawn the opinion. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 13:28, 22 April 2006 (CDT) |
| :Cool. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 14:09, 22 April 2006 (CDT) | | :Cool. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 14:09, 22 April 2006 (CDT) |
|
| |
|
| ==A Favor== | | ==A Favor== |
| Noneofyourbusiness, I've asked a favor of you on [[User talk:The Merovingian]]. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 19:48, 22 April 2006 (CDT) | | Noneofyourbusiness, I've asked a favor of you on [[User talk:The Merovingian]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:48, 22 April 2006 (CDT) |
|
| |
|
| ==Minor?== | | ==Minor?== |
| Line 47: |
Line 43: |
| :::Quite. It's not unrealistic for Baltar to have survived such a wave with cover. He was just thrown around. What killed Six wasn't even the actual shockwave, it was the shards of glass flying into her body. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 17:19, 6 July 2006 (CDT) | | :::Quite. It's not unrealistic for Baltar to have survived such a wave with cover. He was just thrown around. What killed Six wasn't even the actual shockwave, it was the shards of glass flying into her body. [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 17:19, 6 July 2006 (CDT) |
| ::::Exactly. From the windows breaking. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 17:28, 6 July 2006 (CDT) | | ::::Exactly. From the windows breaking. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 17:28, 6 July 2006 (CDT) |
| :Spence, what, in your mind, is the difference between an "atomic" shockwave and a "nuclear" shockwave? Are you getting at the difference between traditional fission bombs and the more powerful hydrogen bombs developed in the 50s? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 21:25, 6 July 2006 (CDT) | | :Spence, what, in your mind, is the difference between an "atomic" shockwave and a "nuclear" shockwave? Are you getting at the difference between traditional fission bombs and the more powerful hydrogen bombs developed in the 50s? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:25, 6 July 2006 (CDT) |
|
| |
|
| == About your last edit on [[SFM]] == | | == About your last edit on [[SFM]] == |
| Line 76: |
Line 72: |
|
| |
|
| I reverted a portion of your edits on [[Basestar (RDM)]]. Class names for the capital ships, battlestar and basestar (as well as baseship) are never capitalized as a proper noun for the same reason we do not capitalize "aircraft carrier," per [[BW:SAC]]. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 11:05, 14 November 2006 (CST) | | I reverted a portion of your edits on [[Basestar (RDM)]]. Class names for the capital ships, battlestar and basestar (as well as baseship) are never capitalized as a proper noun for the same reason we do not capitalize "aircraft carrier," per [[BW:SAC]]. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 11:05, 14 November 2006 (CST) |
| :Well, technically class names - like "Mercury class" are capitalized, but "battlestar/basestar" is a ship type. Like "The Nimitz class aircraft carrier ''Enterprise''" and not "Nimitz class Aircraft Carrier..." --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 12:17, 14 November 2006 (CST)
| |
| ::I can understand that for battlestars, but Basestars aren't just a ship class they're a type of Cylon. We capitalize Raider and Centurion. Regardless, isn't Base Ship two words? -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 20:44, 14 November 2006 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| == Was almost done... ==
| |
|
| |
| when we got edit conflicted. I'm done now. [[User:Shane|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane|talk]]) 16:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :I thought I'd help out, didn't expect you to be so quick. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 17:00, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
| |
| ::Why they call me speady Felix :D [[User:Shane|Shane]] ([[User_Talk:Shane|talk]]) 17:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Battlestar Galactica: The Cylon War ==
| |
|
| |
| *Noneofyourbusiness, your story summaries of the Final Five comic books are great. Since you are so good at writing a summary could you by chance write up summaries for "Battlestar Galactica: The Cylon War" issues 1 to 4? If you don't have the comics, I can email them to you. Just contact me in my talk page. -- [[User:Troyian|Troyian]] 02:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Battlestar Galactica: The Final Five ==
| |
|
| |
| *Just curious, have you checked out the third issue of Battlestar Galactica: The Final Five? -- [[User:Troyian|Troyian]] 20:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == E-mail ==
| |
|
| |
| *Yeah, I got your e-mail. I sent you the info on where to get the application software (for free) to see cbr files! Here it is again:
| |
|
| |
| Go to this webpage:
| |
|
| |
| http://www.geocities.ws/davidayton/CDisplay
| |
|
| |
| and click on "Download version 1.8 NOW" to get the CDisplay Sequential Image Viewer!
| |
| --- [[User:Troyian|Troyian]] 18:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == The Cylon War ==
| |
|
| |
| *Now that you have the software to see CBR files, have you checked out the "Battlestar Galactica: The Cylon War" series that I emailed you? -- [[User:Troyian|Troyian]] 22:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == The Final Five 4 ==
| |
|
| |
| *Don't have the issue yet. I'll check back with you in a few days. -- [[User:Troyian|Troyian]] 03:00, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
| **I've emailed you the issue! -- [[User:Troyian|Troyian]] 07:25, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Wow! ==
| |
|
| |
| Great job with tackling ''[[The Caprican]]'' articles!--[[User:DrWho42|DrWho42]] 05:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :Thank you! I just put my mind to it and did a few at a time. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 12:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Gemenon ==
| |
|
| |
| Looking at the map of the Colonies and seeing a reddish hue coming off the star, I was assuming that is could be Delta in the picture and not Alpha or Beta. Also, the lighting on the planet seems to indicate that Gemenon is being illuminated by another one of the stars and not the one seen in the picture.
| |
|
| |
| *Frylock86 1/29/11 2:17 PM EST.
| |
|
| |
| == Removing definition of "quasi-canon" from Twelve Colonies map page ==
| |
|
| |
| I didn't remove the definition because I thought you were acting in bad faith; if I gave that impression, I sincerely apologize. My motivation for streamlining was because a definition of "quasi-canon" on the page is a distraction from the main focus of the article--the map. Any well-written wiki page has links to important related concepts that are not ''directly'' part of the focus of that page. The best place for that definition is the [[Battlestar Wiki:Canon]] page, of course, since the focus of that page is defining certain Battlestar Wiki terminology. However, as I wrote to Joe Beaudoin on the Talk page, I can't get to it until later in the week. Once that's done, would the streamlined form with a hyperlink directly to the Canon page be satisfactory? -- [[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]] 01:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
| |
| :Maybe, if it links to the section defining it, but on the other hand, it's the only example of the term on the wiki, so it might be better to just define it on the one page where it is relevant. If I was the reader, I'd immediately wonder what being "quasi-canon" said about the map. In my job writing content for web pages, a rule is to define any acronym or inside term at the first mention. When I said "revert good faith edit", I was talking about my reversion of your edit. I thought it was important to make it clear when reverting that one is not calling the edit vandalism. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Punctuation ==
| |
|
| |
| On the "Sexuality in the Twelve Colonies" page, my punctuation edits are correct for US style. Trust me on this--I teach writing and edit manuscripts for a living. --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]] 12:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :I posted a response to your comment. See my talk page. --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]] 23:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
| |
