| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on your user talk page, the [[Battlestar Wiki:Wikipedian Quorum|Wikipedian Quorum]] or [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|Administrators' noticeboard]]. Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~<!---->~~<!---->~)! We look forward to your contributions to the community! | | Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on your user talk page, the [[Battlestar Wiki:Wikipedian Quorum|Wikipedian Quorum]] or [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|Administrators' noticeboard]]. Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~<!---->~~<!---->~)! We look forward to your contributions to the community! |
| --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 07:20, 15 June 2006 (CDT) | | --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 07:20, 15 June 2006 (CDT) |
|
| |
| ==Analysis stuff==
| |
|
| |
| Mateo, trying to get something positive out of conflict of opinion on the Analysis stuff: A) If you want to remove the ranking labels we made, well we started discussing that over on the page's Talk section; I wouldn't want to remove it; it's just a label or guideline and I'm not chisling 15 commandments into stone or something, but if you want we could play with that B) But you said that your real problem underyling all of this is much of the Analysis info which isn't a direct statement, i.e. ruling out people with 20 year confirmed backstories, taking Caprica-Sharon's explanation of the history of the Cylon procreation program at face value, etc. I'm sorry to come to loggerheads over that, but I think it's a great example of a ''really'' well thought out, ''Non-POV'' Analysis and I've actually been proud of how it wasn't POV and degenerating into "I don't like the look of that fella, he must be a Cylon", but based on points and counterpoints. --->We can play around with the other stuff if you think that will help; thanks for explaining your position more thoroughly on the Talk page there, but really I think your questions of the article as a whole as based on "Assumptions" is unreasonable. We'll discuss those other changes, though. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 00:55, 19 August 2006 (CDT)
| |
