Editing User talk:FulltimeDefendent

== Welcome to Battlestar Wiki! ==
Welcome to the Wiki, FulltimeDefendent. Feel free to tell us about yourself on [[User:FulltimeDefendent|your user page]]. Before you get started on other edits, please read the [[Battlestar Wiki:Standards and Conventions|Standards and Conventions]], which details the policies we use in editing pages (this differs from many other wikis in its particular use of verb tense, abbreviations, formatting, and the like). If you need help in learning how to use the MediaWiki tools supported here, you can check out the [[BW:TUT|tutorial]] and the [[BW:MARK|wiki markup code]] pages for assistance.

Please read the articles [[Battlestar Wiki:What is Battlestar Wiki|"What is Battlestar Wiki"]] and [[Battlestar Wiki:What Battlestar Wiki is not|"What Battlestar Wiki is Not."]] This important information details what contributions are acceptable in this encyclopedia.

We encourage you to participate in any [[Battlestar Wiki:Project List|projects]] on Battlestar Wiki, which work to enhance a particular subject or extension of the wiki. These include the [[Battlestar Wiki:Original Series Article Development Project|Original Series Article Development Project]] and several [[Battlestar Wiki:Translation Project|language translations of Battlestar Wiki]]. If you have a new idea for a new project, visit the [[BW:TANK|Think Tank]], where we hash out large-scale ideas before implementing them.

Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on an article's talk page that's relevant to the subject, the [[Battlestar Wiki:Wikipedian Quorum|Wikipedian Quorum]] or [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|the Administrators' noticeboard]].  Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~<!---->~~<!---->~)!

We look forward to your contributions to the community!
--[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 00:21, 12 December 2006 (CST)

== Regarding "Wheatlon" ==

Please note that your article, "Wheatlon", has been deleted [[BW:DEL|per policy]] as it had no meaningful content. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 18:06, 20 December 2006 (CST)

== Standards and Conventions ==

Could you please have a look at [[BW:SAC|Standard and Conventions]]? For example the part about the formatting of titles. Episodes have quotation marks around them when cited within a sentence. But other works such as ''Star Trek'' are written in italics, and not with quotation marks. That might sound arbitrary, but it creates a consistent look. Moreover, ship names are also put in italics.

The content of your contributions is good, but the formatting needs to be polished a bit sometimes. This isn't meant as a huge criticism. Just a suggestion :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 07:43, 31 January 2007 (CST)

==Culture==
Just to let you know that I removed the link to "culture" from the RDM colonies series because the page has not yet been created yet. When the page is created feel free to remove the commenting arrows to put it back in --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 07:57, 31 January 2007 (CST)
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 == Standards and Conventions ==
-Could you please have a look at [[BW:SAC|Standards and Conventions]]? For example the part about the formatting of titles. Episodes have quotation marks around them when cited within a sentence. But other works such as ''Star Trek'' are written in italics, and not with quotation marks. That might sound arbitrary, but it creates a consistent look. Moreover, ship names are also put in italics.
+Could you please have a look at [[BW:SAC|Standard and Conventions]]? For example the part about the formatting of titles. Episodes have quotation marks around them when cited within a sentence. But other works such as ''Star Trek'' are written in italics, and not with quotation marks. That might sound arbitrary, but it creates a consistent look. Moreover, ship names are also put in italics.
 The content of your contributions is good, but the formatting needs to be polished a bit sometimes. This isn't meant as a huge criticism. Just a suggestion :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 07:43, 31 January 2007 (CST)
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 ==Culture==
 Just to let you know that I removed the link to "culture" from the RDM colonies series because the page has not yet been created yet. When the page is created feel free to remove the commenting arrows to put it back in --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 07:57, 31 January 2007 (CST)
-== Tense ==
-We generally use the present tense here. Kobol still exists, so the ruins ''are'' 2000 years old. The discovery of the Lion's Head Beacon or the Temple of Five are in the past, but since we use the present tense, those two objects ''are'' dated to their respective age. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:47, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
-:As a rule, all events that happen during or after the [[Fall of the Colonies|Cylon attack]] are written about in the present tense. Only if an event takes place ''before'' the events of the [[Miniseries]] is it chronicled in past tense. (Determining tense for [[Razor]] is gonna be fun.) --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 10:26, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
-== Question? ==
-How does one create a new page? {{unsigned|FulltimeDefendent}}
-:Type its title in the search bar. Then you will get a notice that it doesn't exist, but that you can create it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:21, 29 June 2007 (CDT)
-::Another way is to create a link to the page you want to create on another page. It will show up as a red/broken link, but when you click on that link it will take you to an edit session that will create the new article. The advantage of that approach is that you already have a link to your new page is that you won't have an "orphan" page (a page with no links pointing to it), even from the beginning. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 18:44, 29 June 2007 (CDT)