| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 34: |
Line 34: |
| To me, this seems to mean that each colony built its own battlestar. But likely not all the colonies had the means to construct ships the size of Galactica. Aquaria, Libran, and perhaps Sagittaron come to mind. | | To me, this seems to mean that each colony built its own battlestar. But likely not all the colonies had the means to construct ships the size of Galactica. Aquaria, Libran, and perhaps Sagittaron come to mind. |
|
| |
|
| " They formed the lead ships of period Battlestar Groups, "
| | "They formed the lead ships of period Battlestar Groups, ". |
| | |
| What do you mean by "period" Battlestar Groups? Battlestar Groups during the Cylon War period? If so, it seems badly phrased. | | What do you mean by "period" Battlestar Groups? Battlestar Groups during the Cylon War period? If so, it seems badly phrased. |
|
| |
|
| " Unfortunately, the class didn't hold up well to the Cylon threat, [snip], [8] quite possibly due to the corners that were cut in their construction - a similar fate Galactica would suffer nearly 45 years later. "
| | "Unfortunately, the class didn't hold up well to the Cylon threat, [snip], [8] quite possibly due to the corners that were cut in their construction - a similar fate Galactica would suffer nearly 45 years later. " |
|
| |
|
| This is conjecture. The majority of the 12 original battlestars could as well have been destroyed due to the severity of which the war was fought. A decade of heavy action isn't the best way to keep a class of ships in good shape. And just because Galactica was seemingly build cutting corners, that doesn't mean shipyards around other colonies use similar practices. | | This is conjecture. The majority of the 12 original battlestars could as well have been destroyed due to the severity of which the war was fought. A decade of heavy action isn't the best way to keep a class of ships in good shape. And just because Galactica was seemingly build cutting corners, that doesn't mean shipyards around other colonies use similar practices. |
|
| |
|
| " but their main show of force came from the multiple Viper stacks housed in the flight pods. "
| | "but their main show of force came from the multiple Viper stacks housed in the flight pods." |
| | |
| Personally, I'd use the word "squadrons" here instead of "stacks", and rephrase the text afterwards a bit to explain the stack system. [[User:Geo|Geo]] 14:26, 20 January 2013 (EST)
| |
| | |
| ===Revisions===
| |
| | |
| ** "To me, this seems to mean that each colony built its own battlestar. But likely not all the colonies had the means to construct ships the size of Galactica. Aquaria, Libran, and perhaps Sagittaron come to mind."
| |
| | |
| - Yes. From what I understand the Colonies initially built 12 battlestars, with each one representing each Colony. ''Galactica'' represented [[Caprica (RDM)|Caprica]], for example.
| |
| | |
| ** "What do you mean by "period" Battlestar Groups? Battlestar Groups during the Cylon War period? If so, it seems badly phrased."
| |
| | |
| - Yes. Cylon War period groups, since we have no idea what "modern" groups looked like.
| |
| | |
| ** "This is conjecture. The majority of the 12 original battlestars could as well have been destroyed due to the severity of which the war was fought. A decade of heavy action isn't the best way to keep a class of ships in good shape. And just because Galactica was seemingly build cutting corners, that doesn't mean shipyards around other colonies use similar practices."
| |
| | |
| - True. We could remove that if people would like.
| |
| | |
| | |
| - Fry.
| |
| | |
| " - Yes. From what I understand the Colonies initially built 12 battlestars, with each one representing each Colony. ''Galactica'' represented [[Caprica (RDM)|Caprica]], for example. "
| |
| | |
| Yes, but what I meant was your phrasing indicates each colony built its own Galactica-style battlestar. But some colonies likely didn't have the means to do so on their own for a variety of reasons. Be it either too low a population level, planetary poverty, lack of a proper shipyard, submission to another colony,...
| |
| | |
| Not inclined to have a go at the "stack" description? ;) -- [[User:Geo|Geo]] 10:49, 22 January 2013 (EST)
| |
| | |
| | |
| == Basestar ==
| |
| | |
| Hello. I have seen, that you have changed the Infobox from the Basestars. Wher comes your Info of the "Flak" from? A quote from the Article: "...a basestar does not appear to have point-defense batteries,..." --[[User:Enabran|Enabran]] 08:29, 18 September 2013 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| Hi, the battle of the Resurrection hub had Flak in use. Unless it is a VFX error, I included it in the basestar's defenses. If the general consensus doesn't like it, it can be removed. [[User:Frylock86|Frylock86]] 18:04, 18 September 2013 (EDT)[[User:Frylock86|Frylock86]] 18:04, 18 September 2013 (EDT)
| | Personally, I'd use the word "squadrons" here instead of "stacks", and rephrase the text afterwards a bit to explain the stack system. |