| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Why would one want to blank the history of an image? Being able to revert to earlier versions is often a valuable tool. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 11:59, 24 April 2006 (CDT) | | Why would one want to blank the history of an image? Being able to revert to earlier versions is often a valuable tool. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 11:59, 24 April 2006 (CDT) |
| :For some cases, like the images me and Mercifull, once I submitted something and then he updated it, what is the point of having two of the same image. This would go for the DVD screencaptures also. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:02, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::For example. There was originally one image for a translation project whereas now there are two. The old one was then put forward for deletion. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 12:04, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :::Total deletation, not just a reverion deletion, I beleive... --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:06, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| :I've often found that new screencaptures are inferior to older versions. We shouldn't deprive ourselves of the ability to make that choice later on. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 12:32, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
