Editing Template talk:Archive-item
Discussion page of Template:Archive-item
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User: | Is there any way to get a single ":" style indent at the beginning of these lists, to line up the header links with the bullet point above them? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User: | :Ehm, I guess it's easy enough to do by hand. Not everything has to be automatic. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:36, 17 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User: | ::The <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> business seems to force the insertion of a carriage return after each use of this template. I've unfortunately had to remove Shane's helpful instructions to fix the appearance. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:48, 17 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User: | ::This looks almost perfect, except that having the ":" spacer wrapped inside the <nowiki><small></nowiki> tag, as we were doing before, improves the alignment dramatically. We may have to use some kind of start-section, end-section system, like we did on the succession templates, to get around this. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 00:51, 17 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
Maybe instead of the qif that axes the closing comma, we could just comma-separate the entries by hand? The template system is workable, but it seems kind of like overkill. --[[User: | Maybe instead of the qif that axes the closing comma, we could just comma-separate the entries by hand? The template system is workable, but it seems kind of like overkill. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:13, 20 May 2006 (CDT) | ||