Editing Talk:Zephyr/Archive 1
Discussion page of Zephyr/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't we call the ''Space Park'' something more Galactica like. This ship could be the ''Rising Star'' even with Libran registry. it could've been in orbit around Picon during the attacks? {{unsigned|CoreyDanian}} | Shouldn't we call the ''Space Park'' something more Galactica like. This ship could be the ''Rising Star'' even with Libran registry. it could've been in orbit around Picon during the attacks? {{unsigned|CoreyDanian}} | ||
:If the "Rising Star" resembles the TOS version, it would look nothing like the Space Park. In any case, we've had no indication that they are the same ship - remember, it's a big fleet. --[[User: | :If the "Rising Star" resembles the TOS version, it would look nothing like the Space Park. In any case, we've had no indication that they are the same ship - remember, it's a big fleet. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:37, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the ''Rising Star''.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] 3 October 2006 | ::You never know, Peter. But I believe that that is the ''Rising Star''.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] 3 October 2006 | ||
:::Do you have a source on that? --[[User: | :::Do you have a source on that? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:43, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::Nop. Just intuition.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] | ::::Nop. Just intuition.--[[User:CoreyDanian|CoreyDanian]] | ||
:::::Unfortunately, intuition isn't enough for us here. You might want to give [[BW:CITE]] a read. --[[User: | :::::Unfortunately, intuition isn't enough for us here. You might want to give [[BW:CITE]] a read. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:21, 3 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::::::Space Park has been the term used on all official sources, SciFi website, Sky One profiles and i belive the companion books. Giving it a name without an official source would be pure speculation --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 03:11, 3 October 2006 (CDT) | ::::::Space Park has been the term used on all official sources, SciFi website, Sky One profiles and i belive the companion books. Giving it a name without an official source would be pure speculation --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 03:11, 3 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
== How sure are we of some of the info presented here? == | == How sure are we of some of the info presented here? == | ||
A lot of the stuff about the Space Park being of an older design - utilized before artificial gravity became readily available - comes from the Sci-Fi website and hasn't been proven on screen or in dialog (not to mention that the ship looks ''way'' too advanced to be of an old design). As is the notion that it was a military vessel converted to civilian use. Should we perhaps remove this information? Really, it's just speculation. -- [[User:Helo87|Helo87]] | A lot of the stuff about the Space Park being of an older design - utilized before artificial gravity became readily available - comes from the Sci-Fi website and hasn't been proven on screen or in dialog (not to mention that the ship looks ''way'' too advanced to be of an old design). As is the notion that it was a military vessel converted to civilian use. Should we perhaps remove this information? Really, it's just speculation. -- [[User:Helo87|Helo87]] | ||