Editing Talk:Viper 1104/Archive 1
Discussion page of Viper 1104/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
SciFi's CAG roster, which they kept updated in the first season, never decremented to account for the loss of this fighter. However, the damage always looked quite severe to me, certainly more so than [[Viper 289]], declared unsalvageable in "[[Flight of the Phoenix]]". | SciFi's CAG roster, which they kept updated in the first season, never decremented to account for the loss of this fighter. However, the damage always looked quite severe to me, certainly more so than [[Viper 289]], declared unsalvageable in "[[Flight of the Phoenix]]". | ||
Do any of you think we should note this vessel as destroyed/scrapped in the Galactica (RDM) tallies? --[[User: | Do any of you think we should note this vessel as destroyed/scrapped in the Galactica (RDM) tallies? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:03, 17 December 2005 (EST) | ||
Here's a pic of 1104 at Ragnar, this is at least the second time it's registry is visible during the battle. This is when Starbuck flips over before going nose-to-nose with 7242. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 18:38, 21 February 2006 (EST) | Here's a pic of 1104 at Ragnar, this is at least the second time it's registry is visible during the battle. This is when Starbuck flips over before going nose-to-nose with 7242. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 18:38, 21 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:It looks like 1104 survived the battle as it's visible right behind Socinus in the below pic (and repaired as well). It makes sense though, for once they actually had time to recover the fighter or what was left of it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 12:57, 22 February 2006 (EST) | :It looks like 1104 survived the battle as it's visible right behind Socinus in the below pic (and repaired as well). It makes sense though, for once they actually had time to recover the fighter or what was left of it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 12:57, 22 February 2006 (EST) | ||
::This gives us some idea of the extent of ''Galactica's'' repair capabilities. I wonder why [[Viper 289]] had to be scrapped? Probably unshown structural damage or somesuch. --[[User: | ::This gives us some idea of the extent of ''Galactica's'' repair capabilities. I wonder why [[Viper 289]] had to be scrapped? Probably unshown structural damage or somesuch. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:15, 22 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:::Perhaps 1104 didn't suffer damage to its frame like 289 seemed to have. 1104 lost it's wings and engines but the fuselage seemed relatively unharmed. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 19:57, 22 February 2006 (EST) | :::Perhaps 1104 didn't suffer damage to its frame like 289 seemed to have. 1104 lost it's wings and engines but the fuselage seemed relatively unharmed. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 19:57, 22 February 2006 (EST) | ||
[[File:1104Ragnar Mini.JPG|thumb|1104NC at the Battle of the Ragnar Anchorage ([[Miniseries]]).]] | [[File:1104Ragnar Mini.JPG|thumb|1104NC at the Battle of the Ragnar Anchorage ([[Miniseries]]).]] | ||