Editing Talk:Tylium (RDM)/Archive 1
Discussion page of Tylium (RDM)/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I tend to agree, unless there's a good reason, we should just have "tyllium" redirected to the original page. I haven't a clue how to do this. [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:47, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT) | :I tend to agree, unless there's a good reason, we should just have "tyllium" redirected to the original page. I haven't a clue how to do this. [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:47, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT) | ||
::Leave a message on Joe's talk page. --[[User: | ::Leave a message on Joe's talk page. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:32, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT) | ||
==Move to Tylium (RDM)== | ==Move to Tylium (RDM)== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:No. The searches for "Tylium TOS" would be so uncommon it simply wouldn't be worth it. If you want maybe we could have "Tylium TOS" and "Tlyium", but "Tlyium RDM" would be too bulky, relative to the actual number of people searching for the other. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 20:08, 11 July 2006 (CDT) | :No. The searches for "Tylium TOS" would be so uncommon it simply wouldn't be worth it. If you want maybe we could have "Tylium TOS" and "Tlyium", but "Tlyium RDM" would be too bulky, relative to the actual number of people searching for the other. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 20:08, 11 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Would we have anything interesting to say in "Tylium (TOS)"? --[[User: | :Would we have anything interesting to say in "Tylium (TOS)"? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:04, 11 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I agree with Peter, keep the Tylium and then have a Tylium (TOS) only if absolutely needed. No need to put (RDM) in every article title. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 02:49, 12 July 2006 (CDT) | ::I agree with Peter, keep the Tylium and then have a Tylium (TOS) only if absolutely needed. No need to put (RDM) in every article title. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 02:49, 12 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
I thought the reason the Colonials used a conventional warhead in "[[The Hand of God (RDM)|The Hand of God]]" was so that there would be a big enough explosion to take out the Cyclons and secondly, the Tylium would NOT be destroyed?--[[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 17:14, 18 July 2007 (CDT) | I thought the reason the Colonials used a conventional warhead in "[[The Hand of God (RDM)|The Hand of God]]" was so that there would be a big enough explosion to take out the Cyclons and secondly, the Tylium would NOT be destroyed?--[[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 17:14, 18 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Here is what Baltar has to say: | :Yes, that seems to be somewhat wrong. Here is what Baltar has to say: | ||
::"But the radiation would render the ore inert. Unusable. I see your dilemma. Well, you're in luck, you know. Refined tylium contains tremendous enthalpy to the order of half a billion mega joules per kilo. If subjected to the right heat and compression, say, from a conventional warhead, you should get a suitably devastating explosion without the radioactive fallout. All we have to do is hit the right spot. Specifically, you need to hit the staging tanks for the refined tylium precursor. It's a lot more unstable than the fuel itself." | ::"But the radiation would render the ore inert. Unusable. I see your dilemma. Well, you're in luck, you know. Refined tylium contains tremendous enthalpy to the order of half a billion mega joules per kilo. If subjected to the right heat and compression, say, from a conventional warhead, you should get a suitably devastating explosion without the radioactive fallout. All we have to do is hit the right spot. Specifically, you need to hit the staging tanks for the refined tylium precursor. It's a lot more unstable than the fuel itself." | ||
:So, it sounds like the ore is not volatile. Only refined tylium is | :So, it sounds like the ore is not volatile. Only refined tylium is. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 17:19, 18 July 2007 (CDT) | ||