Editing Talk:Timeline (TOS)/Archive 1
Discussion page of Timeline (TOS)/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
I struck out what I felt was opinionated commentary on the ''quality'' of ''Galactica 1980'' from this article. I'm not even sure that even Glen Larson (who no longer has full ownership or control of the ''Galactica'' series) can be cited as a ''de facto'' authority on the canonical relevance of ''1980''. I tend to treat Larson's comments about ''1980'' as I treated Gene Roddenberry's thoughts of ''Star Trek V''--with great respect, because I personally thought that both stories were pretty terrible. But for '''us''' to make that qualification, considering we do not yet mark any ''Galactica 1980'' stories here as sep-con, strikes me as given a mixed message. If an NBC Universal spokesperson came out and said "It's bunk" then I'd ask to have ''1980'' marked as such. But we need to keep to our current message in all articles that ''1980'' is treated as canon on Battlestar Wiki, or we need to relegate it to sep-con status.--[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:27, 27 May 2007 (CDT) | I struck out what I felt was opinionated commentary on the ''quality'' of ''Galactica 1980'' from this article. I'm not even sure that even Glen Larson (who no longer has full ownership or control of the ''Galactica'' series) can be cited as a ''de facto'' authority on the canonical relevance of ''1980''. I tend to treat Larson's comments about ''1980'' as I treated Gene Roddenberry's thoughts of ''Star Trek V''--with great respect, because I personally thought that both stories were pretty terrible. But for '''us''' to make that qualification, considering we do not yet mark any ''Galactica 1980'' stories here as sep-con, strikes me as given a mixed message. If an NBC Universal spokesperson came out and said "It's bunk" then I'd ask to have ''1980'' marked as such. But we need to keep to our current message in all articles that ''1980'' is treated as canon on Battlestar Wiki, or we need to relegate it to sep-con status.--[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:27, 27 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
: I tend to agree. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 10:32, 27 May 2007 (CDT) | : I tend to agree. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 10:32, 27 May 2007 (CDT) | ||