Editing Talk:Thomas Zarek/Archive 1
Discussion page of Thomas Zarek/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:Why is it being judged "non-canonical" already? From what (little) I've seen so far, there's nothing to suggest that it would contradict established canon. --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]] 13:05, 17 September 2006 (EDT) | :Why is it being judged "non-canonical" already? From what (little) I've seen so far, there's nothing to suggest that it would contradict established canon. --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]] 13:05, 17 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
== Zarek in Exodus == | == Zarek in Exodus == | ||
| Line 46: | Line 43: | ||
==Veep?== | ==Veep?== | ||
After his actions in Collaborators, can we still assume that Roslin's offer of the vice-presidency remained open? --[[User: | After his actions in Collaborators, can we still assume that Roslin's offer of the vice-presidency remained open? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:09, 28 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:I don't know, I kept it ambiguous in the Pesidency section I wrote. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 14:17, 28 October 2006 (CDT) | :I don't know, I kept it ambiguous in the Pesidency section I wrote. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 14:17, 28 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User: | ::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:18, 28 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT) | :::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT) | ||