| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 29: |
Line 29: |
| No, you are wrong. I have reviewed the scenes in question and there is no indication that Zarek has convinced Baltar to run at the end of their scene together in The Captain's Hand. It is ambiguous, at the very least. Zarek may have opened his eyes to the possibility of running and winning, but there is no definitive indication that Baltar WILL INDEED run at the end of their conversation together. You are making unwarranted assumptions. I could just as easily argue that Six convinced Baltar to run since her image appears to him at the exact moment he appears to decide to make the announcement of his candidacy. She has many times previously pushed him to ascend to the presidency, and that interpretation is equally logical and supportable. I believe you are overstepping the bounds of reporting into the area of excessive interpretation. ----Elach 23:06, 12 July 2006 (PDT) | | No, you are wrong. I have reviewed the scenes in question and there is no indication that Zarek has convinced Baltar to run at the end of their scene together in The Captain's Hand. It is ambiguous, at the very least. Zarek may have opened his eyes to the possibility of running and winning, but there is no definitive indication that Baltar WILL INDEED run at the end of their conversation together. You are making unwarranted assumptions. I could just as easily argue that Six convinced Baltar to run since her image appears to him at the exact moment he appears to decide to make the announcement of his candidacy. She has many times previously pushed him to ascend to the presidency, and that interpretation is equally logical and supportable. I believe you are overstepping the bounds of reporting into the area of excessive interpretation. ----Elach 23:06, 12 July 2006 (PDT) |
| :Going to have to agree to the above statements pertaining to the scene evidence. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 01:18, 13 July 2006 (CDT) | | :Going to have to agree to the above statements pertaining to the scene evidence. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 01:18, 13 July 2006 (CDT) |
| ::One could interpret Baltar's subtle encouragement of Roslin's abortion ban as an attempt to manipulate her into a position wherein he could run against her. I know that's how I saw it. I don't think Zarek convinced Baltar right at the start to run, but I believe that, after some thought, Baltar made up his mind. --[[User:Slander|Slander]] 10:08, 27 October 2006 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Comic series == | | == Comic series == |
|
| |
|
| Zarek will be getting his own comic series from Dynamite, which focuses on his past. [http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=82025] --[[User:DrBat|DrBat]] 12:07, 27 August 2006 (CDT) | | Zarek will be getting his own comic series from Dynamite, which focuses on his past. [http://forum.newsarama.com/showthread.php?t=82025] --[[User:DrBat|DrBat]] 12:07, 27 August 2006 (CDT) |
| :Non-canonical, but looks to be better drawn and written than the current ones. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 13:09, 27 August 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :Why is it being judged "non-canonical" already? From what (little) I've seen so far, there's nothing to suggest that it would contradict established canon. --[[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]] 13:05, 17 September 2006 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| ::I agree. Judgeing from the first issue, and the fact that the narrator is Zarek himself, there is no diverge from contunity of the current series. Is sits rather firmly in the framwork of what we all ready know about the character. While I wouldn't go changeing things in either article until the comic is complete, I wouldn't jump to conclusions either.--[[User:Deepbluesky|Deepbluesky]] 18:59, 5 February 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| ::: Regardless of how close to the framework the comics sit, unless otherwise stated by RDM or The Powers that Be, the series [[canon]] consists of what's been aired, as well as comments made in the podcasts. Thus making the comics non-canon. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:11, 5 February 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| == Zarek in Exodus ==
| |
| http://www.comicscontinuum.com/stories/0610/01/index.htm
| |
| Click on this link and scroll down to see scenes from the Exodus episodes. The last one at the bottom shows Zarek and Roslin plsticuffed together. Hopefully they'll start to get along soon. She almost looks happy despite their situation. --ltcrashdown October 3rd, 2006
| |
|
| |
| ==Veep?==
| |
| After his actions in Collaborators, can we still assume that Roslin's offer of the vice-presidency remained open? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 14:09, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :I don't know, I kept it ambiguous in the Pesidency section I wrote. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 14:17, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::I was concerned with the succession boxes. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 14:18, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :::That's what I thought you were talking about. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 14:22, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::::Ask Brad Thompson? --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 06:23, 6 February 2007 (CST)
| |
|
| |
| == Locked ==
| |
|
| |
| Why is this still locked? [[Sine Qua Non]] aired a long time ago. [[User:Space Lizard|Space Lizard]] 17:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Meaning of Toms Name ==
| |
| The meaning of toms name is "Twin of The Baal Protected King". Baal is seen to christians is the devil. I wonder if this has something to do with clyon god.
| |
|
| |
| == Thomas Zarek ==
| |
|
| |
| Zarek's full name was stated by Roslin in "Colonial Day". The page should be moved per Leland Adama. I'd move it, but I can't. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 16:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Moves were locked down after vandals demonstrated that a LARGE number of moves can be very disruptive. I believe you can get move privileges by getting the "Pilot" user group added to your user. I'm not sure how to do that, but Shane, Joe, or Spencerian should be able to hook you up, I would think. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 16:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
