Editing Talk:Soldiers of the One/Archive 1
Discussion page of Soldiers of the One/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | :It wouldn't be unusual to have both. Battlestar Wiki and Wikipedia (among others) have short sections for related topics that also have their own independent pages (for example, [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]]). -- [[User:BlueResistance|BlueResistance]] 14:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | ::yeah, true, i was just thinking that since we won't be getting much new information about either the STO or the monotheist church, that the two pages together would create a fairly substantial entry and since, like i said, the STO is a part of the church, like the conclave is, it made sense. both [[Galactica (RDM)]] and [[Squadrons of Galactica]] are huge pages that would be a lot more difficult to merge. anyway, thanks. [[User:Pst001|Pst001]] 20:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC) | ||