Editing Talk:Skirmish Over the Red Moon/Archive 1
Discussion page of Skirmish Over the Red Moon/Archive 1
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
::Really, anything that results in deaths probably ought to get noted - which would mean we should have pages for the Gideon Massacre (Resistance) and Skirmish on the High Road (Home, Part I). --[[User: | ::Really, anything that results in deaths probably ought to get noted - which would mean we should have pages for the Gideon Massacre (Resistance) and Skirmish on the High Road (Home, Part I). --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:08, 17 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
:::Actually no; It's covering military engagements and only 4 people were lost there. It wasn't a real fight between both sides, and it would really be redundant because [[Gideon]] covers taht. As for Skirmish on the High Road, that information is already covered under [[ | :::Actually no; It's covering military engagements and only 4 people were lost there. It wasn't a real fight between both sides, and it would really be redundant because [[Gideon]] covers taht. As for Skirmish on the High Road, that information is already covered under [[Battle of Kobol]]. ---Ricimer, 17 Sept, 2005 | ||
*We shouldn't have the battle pages put into the past tense like Spencerian did; I think it makes it harder to read. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 15:44, 14 November 2005 (EST) | *We shouldn't have the battle pages put into the past tense like Spencerian did; I think it makes it harder to read. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 15:44, 14 November 2005 (EST) | ||
:Ricimer, see [[Battlestar Wiki:Standards and Conventions#Verb Tense|the Verb Tense convention]] of the Standards and Conventions page for rationale to my changes here and on many character pages. At first I balked at this, too, but it actually aids us in having to make fewer changes on character and event pages as new events occur since a character is always an active mode object and not a passive mode--from a person watching the show, the character is ''doing'' the event (Peter phrased this point better in the conventions project discussion). Note that some things are really awkward to change, such as describing a past event in this mode, in which case you keep a past-tense voice. Again, this is what we all agreed to do by consensus per the project page. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:38, 14 November 2005 (EST) | :Ricimer, see [[Battlestar Wiki:Standards and Conventions#Verb Tense|the Verb Tense convention]] of the Standards and Conventions page for rationale to my changes here and on many character pages. At first I balked at this, too, but it actually aids us in having to make fewer changes on character and event pages as new events occur since a character is always an active mode object and not a passive mode--from a person watching the show, the character is ''doing'' the event (Peter phrased this point better in the conventions project discussion). Note that some things are really awkward to change, such as describing a past event in this mode, in which case you keep a past-tense voice. Again, this is what we all agreed to do by consensus per the project page. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:38, 14 November 2005 (EST) | ||