Editing Talk:Sharon Valerii/Archive2
Discussion page of Sharon Valerii/Archive2
More actions
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
::::The [[Podcast:The Hub|Podcast]] has confirmed that she survived. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] 09:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC) | ::::The [[Podcast:The Hub|Podcast]] has confirmed that she survived. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] 09:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::Erm... where? I don't see any confirmation of her being alive on that page. My own thought was that she was indeed dead, even though I would find the indirect death of one of the protagonists quite unsatisfying. Not so much because she's dead - wouldn't be the first time after all - but because I would want to really ''see'' her die, get a glimpse of her last thoughts when she realizes she's about to die, seeing the nuclear missiles incoming or so... She's - despite having 'fallen to the dark side' - my favourite character in the show. --[[User:Rabenschwinge|Rabenschwinge]] 18:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | :::::Erm... where? I don't see any confirmation of her being alive on that page. My own thought was that she was indeed dead, even though I would find the indirect death of one of the protagonists quite unsatisfying. Not so much because she's dead - wouldn't be the first time after all - but because I would want to really ''see'' her die, get a glimpse of her last thoughts when she realizes she's about to die, seeing the nuclear missiles incoming or so... She's - despite having 'fallen to the dark side' - my favourite character in the show. --[[User:Rabenschwinge|Rabenschwinge]] 18:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::::The podcast transcript is currently missing everything after the teaser, IIRC it was confirmed in late act 3 or early act 4. | ::::::The podcast transcript is currently missing everything after the teaser, IIRC it was confirmed in late act 3 or early act 4. Boomer started running when D'Anna killed Cavil, so she had more time to escape than Helo, "Athena 2" and D'Anna. -- [[User:Gordon Ecker|Gordon Ecker]] 06:18, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:: I seriously doubt that Boomer - or any eight for that's worth - would "assume that mantle" (of leadership). The way I see the eights, including Boomer, they are simply too cute, naive and emotional for that, even Boomer in her anger when she threatens to "snap your little neck" to Hera in her cradle. "Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned, Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned", but that doesn't make her a leader as the ones or manipulative as the sixes. In the initial episodes of season 3 she does not seem convince anyone of her opinion, and even before that I had the impression that Caprica-Six was the driving force in the reformation. --[[User:Rabenschwinge|Rabenschwinge]] 18:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | :: I seriously doubt that Boomer - or any eight for that's worth - would "assume that mantle" (of leadership). The way I see the eights, including Boomer, they are simply too cute, naive and emotional for that, even Boomer in her anger when she threatens to "snap your little neck" to Hera in her cradle. "Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned, Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned", but that doesn't make her a leader as the ones or manipulative as the sixes. In the initial episodes of season 3 she does not seem convince anyone of her opinion, and even before that I had the impression that Caprica-Six was the driving force in the reformation. --[[User:Rabenschwinge|Rabenschwinge]] 18:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::: Quite a few Colonial characters have had their character go through wild gyrations, i.e. angsty Lee -> pudgy Lee -> gung-ho Lee -> politician Lee, so as far as storytelling goes, why not have the Cylon models go through some identity crises, too LOL And as far as temperaments and characteristics of models staying consistent, well, it's a whole new ballgame. In the theory that is evolution, stress and change will force organisms to adapt and change, or die; the breakout of civil war and the loss of the ability to resurrect and its attendant dwindling of the species are pretty big imperatives for change. And besides, would it be BSG without character twists? Just sayin' ... -- [[User:Fredmdbud1|Fredmdbud1]] 22:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | ::: Quite a few Colonial characters have had their character go through wild gyrations, i.e. angsty Lee -> pudgy Lee -> gung-ho Lee -> politician Lee, so as far as storytelling goes, why not have the Cylon models go through some identity crises, too LOL And as far as temperaments and characteristics of models staying consistent, well, it's a whole new ballgame. In the theory that is evolution, stress and change will force organisms to adapt and change, or die; the breakout of civil war and the loss of the ability to resurrect and its attendant dwindling of the species are pretty big imperatives for change. And besides, would it be BSG without character twists? Just sayin' ... -- [[User:Fredmdbud1|Fredmdbud1]] 22:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | ||